Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(Brevo): méthode pour lier des Contacts (User) à une Company (Siae) #1209

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 13, 2024

Conversation

raphodn
Copy link
Contributor

@raphodn raphodn commented May 13, 2024

Quoi ?

Nouvelle méthode api_brevo.link_company_with_contact_list pour pouvoir rattacher les utilisateurs à leur structure sur Brevo

Similaire à #1123 qui ajoutait api_brevo.link_deal_with_list_contact

@raphodn raphodn changed the base branch from master to raphodn/siae-brevo-company-id May 13, 2024 14:17
@raphodn raphodn requested a review from madjid-asa May 13, 2024 14:17
@raphodn raphodn force-pushed the raphodn/api-brevo-link-company-contact branch from c5df9bd to 5c45a03 Compare May 13, 2024 14:18
Copy link
Contributor

@madjid-asa madjid-asa left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@raphodn raphodn force-pushed the raphodn/siae-brevo-company-id branch from 991a8da to e2aac50 Compare May 13, 2024 14:37
Base automatically changed from raphodn/siae-brevo-company-id to master May 13, 2024 14:43
@raphodn raphodn force-pushed the raphodn/api-brevo-link-company-contact branch from 5c45a03 to e028973 Compare May 13, 2024 14:44
@raphodn raphodn merged commit 1aa7b99 into master May 13, 2024
8 checks passed
@raphodn raphodn deleted the raphodn/api-brevo-link-company-contact branch May 13, 2024 14:53
raphodn added a commit that referenced this pull request May 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants