Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: update Appsero/Client and Appsero/Updater for WP 6.7 compatibility #2448

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 26, 2024

Conversation

shohag121
Copy link
Member

@shohag121 shohag121 commented Nov 25, 2024

All Submissions:

  • My code follow the WordPress' coding standards
  • My code satisfies feature requirements
  • My code is tested
  • My code passes the PHPCS tests
  • My code has proper inline documentation
  • I've included related pull request(s) (optional)
  • I've included developer documentation (optional)
  • I've added proper labels to this pull request

Changes proposed in this Pull Request:

Related Pull Request(s)

  • Full PR Link

Closes

  • Closes #

How to test the changes in this Pull Request:

  • Steps or issue link

Changelog entry

Title

Detailed Description of the pull request. What was previous behaviour
and what will be changed in this PR.

Before Changes

Describe the issue before changes with screenshots(s).

After Changes

Describe the issue after changes with screenshot(s).

Feature Video (optional)

Link of detailed video if this PR is for a feature.

PR Self Review Checklist:

  • Code is not following code style guidelines
  • Bad naming: make sure you would understand your code if you read it a few months from now.
  • KISS: Keep it simple, Sweetie (not stupid!).
  • DRY: Don't Repeat Yourself.
  • Code that is not readable: too many nested 'if's are a bad sign.
  • Performance issues
  • Complicated constructions that need refactoring or comments: code should almost always be self-explanatory.
  • Grammar errors.

FOR PR REVIEWER ONLY:

As a reviewer, your feedback should be focused on the idea, not the person. Seek to understand, be respectful, and focus on constructive dialog.

As a contributor, your responsibility is to learn from suggestions and iterate your pull request should it be needed based on feedback. Seek to collaborate and produce the best possible contribution to the greater whole.

  • Correct — Does the change do what it’s supposed to? ie: code 100% fulfilling the requirements?
  • Secure — Would a nefarious party find some way to exploit this change? ie: everything is sanitized/escaped appropriately for any SQL or XSS injection possibilities?
  • Readable — Will your future self be able to understand this change months down the road?
  • Elegant — Does the change fit aesthetically within the overall style and architecture?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Updated dependencies to improve performance and compatibility.
      • Upgraded appsero/client to version ^v2.0.4.
      • Upgraded appsero/updater to version ^v2.3.1.

@shohag121 shohag121 added Needs: Testing This requires further testing Needs: Dev Review It requires a developer review and approval labels Nov 25, 2024
@shohag121 shohag121 self-assigned this Nov 25, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 25, 2024

Walkthrough

The composer.json file for the wedevs/dokan project has been updated to reflect changes in the version constraints of two dependencies. Specifically, the appsero/client package has been upgraded from version ^v2.0.2 to ^v2.0.4, and the appsero/updater package has been updated from ^v2.3.0 to ^v2.3.1. No other sections of the file, including require-dev, config, autoload, and scripts, have been modified.

Changes

File Change Summary
composer.json Updated dependency versions: appsero/client from ^v2.0.2 to ^v2.0.4; appsero/updater from ^v2.3.0 to ^v2.3.1.

Poem

In the garden of code, where the rabbits play,
New versions hop in, brightening the day.
With appsero updated, they dance with delight,
Minor tweaks made, everything feels right!
So let’s celebrate with a joyful cheer,
For changes so small, yet bring us near! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
composer.json (1)

15-15: Consider adding compatibility tests

Since these dependency updates are intended to ensure WordPress 6.7 compatibility, consider:

  1. Adding specific test cases in your CI pipeline to verify compatibility with WordPress 6.7
  2. Documenting the minimum and maximum tested WordPress versions in your plugin's readme
  3. Setting up automated compatibility checks for future WordPress releases

This will help catch any compatibility issues early and ensure a smooth upgrade path for users.

Also applies to: 17-17

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3d3c9d3 and 36a8c73.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • composer.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • composer.json (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
composer.json (2)

17-17: Verify compatibility and security of appsero/updater upgrade

The version bump from ^v2.3.0 to ^v2.3.1 appears to be a patch update. Let's verify the changes and compatibility.

✅ Verification successful

Patch update v2.3.1 is safe to proceed

Based on the GitHub API results:

  • The update from v2.3.0 to v2.3.1 is a recent patch release (Nov 25, 2024) that fixes a timeout issue during plugin updates
  • No security vulnerabilities were reported for this package
  • The change is backward compatible and focuses on fixing a specific bug related to request timeouts
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the changelog, latest versions, and any security advisories for appsero/updater

# Check latest version and release info
gh api graphql -f query='
{
  repository(owner: "Appsero", name: "updater") {
    releases(first: 3, orderBy: {field: CREATED_AT, direction: DESC}) {
      nodes {
        tagName
        description
        createdAt
      }
    }
  }
}'

# Check for any security advisories
gh api graphql -f query='
{
  securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: COMPOSER, package: "appsero/updater") {
    nodes {
      advisory {
        summary
        severity
        publishedAt
      }
      vulnerableVersionRange
      firstPatchedVersion {
        identifier
      }
    }
  }
}'

# Search for WordPress version compatibility mentions
rg -i "wordpress.*6\.7|wp.*6\.7" --type php

Length of output: 1928


15-15: Verify compatibility and security of appsero/client upgrade

The version bump from ^v2.0.2 to ^v2.0.4 appears to be a minor update. Let's verify the changes and compatibility.

✅ Verification successful

The appsero/client v2.0.4 update is safe to proceed

The version upgrade from v2.0.2 to v2.0.4 is verified to be:

  • Security-wise safe (no vulnerabilities reported)
  • Contains only bug fixes:
    • v2.0.3: Fixed opt-in/out redirection and inaccessible page handling
    • v2.0.4: Fixed translations loading timing issue

The changes are maintenance-focused and don't introduce breaking changes, making this a safe update for WordPress 6.7 compatibility.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the changelog, latest versions, and any security advisories for appsero/client

# Check latest version and release info
gh api graphql -f query='
{
  repository(owner: "Appsero", name: "client") {
    releases(first: 3, orderBy: {field: CREATED_AT, direction: DESC}) {
      nodes {
        tagName
        description
        createdAt
      }
    }
  }
}'

# Check for any security advisories
gh api graphql -f query='
{
  securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: COMPOSER, package: "appsero/client") {
    nodes {
      advisory {
        summary
        severity
        publishedAt
      }
      vulnerableVersionRange
      firstPatchedVersion {
        identifier
      }
    }
  }
}'

Length of output: 1654

@mrabbani mrabbani added 👍 Dev Review Done Upcoming Release and removed Needs: Dev Review It requires a developer review and approval labels Nov 25, 2024
@shashwatahalder01 shashwatahalder01 added QA In Progress QA approved This PR is approved by the QA team and removed Needs: Testing This requires further testing QA In Progress labels Nov 26, 2024
@Aunshon Aunshon merged commit c449b9f into develop Nov 26, 2024
1 of 2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants