Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add myst-parser to docs requirements #111

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 2, 2024

Conversation

nsoranzo
Copy link
Member

@nsoranzo nsoranzo commented Dec 2, 2024

Also:

  • Drop unused EmbeddedLink type.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 2, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 41.03%. Comparing base (621e3f8) to head (8d39c8c).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #111   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   41.03%   41.03%           
=======================================
  Files          51       51           
  Lines        1974     1974           
  Branches      441      441           
=======================================
  Hits          810      810           
  Misses       1047     1047           
  Partials      117      117           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 41.03% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

It generates this warning when building the docs:

```
WARNING: invalid signature for autoattribute ('gxformat2.model::EmbeddedLink.$link') [autodoc]
WARNING: don't know which module to import for autodocumenting 'gxformat2.model::EmbeddedLink.$link' (try placing a "module" or "currentmodule" directive in the document, or giving an explicit module name) [autodoc]
```
@mvdbeek mvdbeek merged commit 30571ba into galaxyproject:main Dec 2, 2024
10 checks passed
@mvdbeek
Copy link
Member

mvdbeek commented Dec 2, 2024

Thank you!

@nsoranzo nsoranzo deleted the docs_requirements branch December 3, 2024 16:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants