Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

compiler: Add participle-based protobuf parser #20

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

camh-
Copy link
Member

@camh- camh- commented Aug 18, 2022

Add a protobuf parser using participle, based on the example in Alec
Thomas's protobuf compiler. I have reworked the parser to be more how I
think it should look and to bring it closer to the BNF(ish) in the
protobuf spec. I have also removed comments from the grammar (they are
ignored like whitespace) since I don't believe the best way to handle
comments will be in the grammar (I am thinking of attaching comments to
tokens in the lexer; we'll see).

At the moment, the protog command just prints out the Go struct for
the parsed form of the protobuf. This will grow into something more
useful as the compiler evolves to be a proper compiler.

We bump the required Go version to 1.18 as there is a small use of
generics in the test code, but I also want to use generics wherever it
makes sense.

Link: https://github.com/alecthomas/participle
Link: https://github.com/alecthomas/protobuf
Link: https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers/docs/reference/proto2-spec
Link: https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers/docs/reference/proto3-spec

@camh- camh- force-pushed the parser branch 2 times, most recently from d1f0734 to ec88818 Compare August 18, 2022 07:23
Base automatically changed from tidy-up to master August 18, 2022 07:30
Add a protobuf parser using participle, based on the example in Alec
Thomas's protobuf compiler. I have reworked the parser to be more how I
think it should look and to bring it closer to the BNF(ish) in the
protobuf spec. I have also removed comments from the grammar (they are
ignored like whitespace) since I don't believe the best way to handle
comments will be in the grammar (I am thinking of attaching comments to
tokens in the lexer; we'll see).

At the moment, the `protog` command just prints out the Go struct for
the parsed form of the protobuf. This will grow into something more
useful as the compiler evolves to be a proper compiler.

We bump the required Go version to 1.18 as there is a small use of
generics in the test code, but I also want to use generics wherever it
makes sense.

Link: https://github.com/alecthomas/participle
Link: https://github.com/alecthomas/protobuf
Link: https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers/docs/reference/proto2-spec
Link: https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers/docs/reference/proto3-spec
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant