Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 31, 2024. It is now read-only.

Hydrate failure node #456

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 18, 2024
Merged

Hydrate failure node #456

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 18, 2024

Conversation

pingsutw
Copy link
Member

@pingsutw pingsutw commented Jan 18, 2024

TL;DR

Hydrate failure nodes during registration, so that we can successfully register a workflow with failure nodes.

Type

  • Bug Fix
  • Feature
  • Plugin

Are all requirements met?

  • Code completed
  • Smoke tested
  • Unit tests added
  • Code documentation added
  • Any pending items have an associated Issue

Complete description

command:

pyflyte --pkgs failure_node package -o union-airflow-package.tgz --force
flytectl register files union-airflow-package.tgz --archive -p union-airflow -d development --version v4 --logger.level 4

Workflow:

import typing
from click.testing import CliRunner

from flytekit import task, workflow, ImageSpec, WorkflowFailurePolicy, reference_task, reference_launch_plan
from flytekit.clis.sdk_in_container import pyflyte
from flytekit.types.error.error import FlyteError

new_flytekit = "git+https://github.com/flyteorg/flytekit.git@master"
image_spec = ImageSpec(packages=[new_flytekit], apt_packages=["git"], registry="pingsutw")


@task
def create_cluster(name: str):
    print(f"Creating cluster: {name}")


@task()
def t1(name: str):
    print(f"{name}")
    raise ValueError("Fail!")

@workflow()
def wff():
    t1(name="2")


@task()
def delete_cluster(name: str, err: typing.Optional[FlyteError] = None):
    print(f"Deleting cluster {name}")
    print(err)


@task()
def clean_up(name: str, err: typing.Optional[FlyteError] = None):
    print(f"Deleting cluster {name} due to {err}")
    print(err)


@workflow(on_failure=clean_up, failure_policy=WorkflowFailurePolicy.FAIL_AFTER_EXECUTABLE_NODES_COMPLETE)
def subwf(name: str = "kevin"):
    c = create_cluster(name=name)
    t = t1(name="2")
    d = delete_cluster(name=name)
    c >> t >> d


@workflow(on_failure=clean_up, failure_policy=WorkflowFailurePolicy.FAIL_AFTER_EXECUTABLE_NODES_COMPLETE)
def wf1(name: str = "kevin"):
    c = create_cluster(name=name)
    subwf(name="pingsutw")
    t = t1(name="2")
    d = delete_cluster(name=name)
    c >> t >> d


@workflow(on_failure=clean_up, failure_policy=WorkflowFailurePolicy.FAIL_AFTER_EXECUTABLE_NODES_COMPLETE)
def wf2(name: str = "kevin"):
    c = create_cluster(name=name)
    t = t1(name="2")
    d = delete_cluster(name=name)
    c >> t >> d


@workflow
def clean_up_wf(name: str = "kevin"):
    return create_cluster(name=name)


@workflow(on_failure=clean_up_wf, failure_policy=WorkflowFailurePolicy.FAIL_AFTER_EXECUTABLE_NODES_COMPLETE)
def wf3(name: str = "Kevin"):
    c = create_cluster(name=name)
    t = t1(name="2")
    d = delete_cluster(name=name)
    c >> t >> d

Tracking Issue

https://github.com/flyteorg/flyte/issues/

Follow-up issue

NA

Signed-off-by: Kevin Su <[email protected]>
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 18, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: 6 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (54ddddb) 67.75% compared to head (faa901c) 67.70%.

Files Patch % Lines
cmd/register/register_util.go 25.00% 4 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #456      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   67.75%   67.70%   -0.06%     
==========================================
  Files         148      148              
  Lines        6633     6641       +8     
==========================================
+ Hits         4494     4496       +2     
- Misses       1851     1855       +4     
- Partials      288      290       +2     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 67.70% <33.33%> (-0.06%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@pingsutw pingsutw merged commit 35de5b8 into master Jan 18, 2024
13 of 15 checks passed
@pingsutw pingsutw deleted the failure_node branch January 18, 2024 01:06
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants