feat: add show hidden option to outputs panel #1209
+72
−18
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Thomas White <[email protected]>
TomW1605
changed the title
|
dont think im going to get around to adding the thing to display hidden ones differently but the _ at the start of the name should be enough. i also cant work out what tests are needed for this and cant actually find any existing tests for the ui to see what sort of stuff is being tested. so im marking this as ready. if someone can point me at some existing ui tests or can give me guidance on what should be tested here i will work on that but i will do a new PR for the different look thing |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
feat: add show hidden option to outputs panel
adds an option to the outputs panel that lets you show any outputs that have been hidden by putting
_at the start of their name.i would like to add something that makes it so you can tell the "hidden" ones apart but that seems a bit more complex.
i ran this through the existing test and it passed everything but havnt had a chance to look at writing any new ones for this option
Signed-off-by: Thomas White [email protected]