Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature/restructure port map #177

Merged
merged 47 commits into from
Jan 2, 2024
Merged

Feature/restructure port map #177

merged 47 commits into from
Jan 2, 2024

Conversation

iitaku
Copy link
Collaborator

@iitaku iitaku commented Dec 19, 2023

This PR includes:

  • Code restructure for port binding feature
  • Introduce Port::bind new API set which will deprecate PortMap (See test for usage)

@iitaku iitaku force-pushed the feature/restructure-port-map branch from a488d19 to ec5bb36 Compare December 28, 2023 02:11
@iitaku iitaku requested a review from xinyuli1204 January 2, 2024 18:16
@iitaku
Copy link
Collaborator Author

iitaku commented Jan 2, 2024

@xinyuli1204 Can you take over Python part?

  • Implement new Port::bind API sets
  • Fix python tutorial/sample code to use Port::bind

@iitaku
Copy link
Collaborator Author

iitaku commented Jan 2, 2024

@xinyuli1204 Can you take over Python part?

  • Implement new Port::bind API sets
  • Fix python tutorial/sample code to use Port::bind

I created #182 for the python part. I will merge this PR and let's keep working on the remaining on #182.

@iitaku iitaku merged commit 2c23367 into master Jan 2, 2024
@xinyuli1204
Copy link
Contributor

@xinyuli1204 Can you take over Python part?

  • Implement new Port::bind API sets
  • Fix python tutorial/sample code to use Port::bind

I created #182 for the python part. I will merge this PR and let's keep working on the remaining on #182.

OK , I will.

@iitaku iitaku deleted the feature/restructure-port-map branch January 21, 2024 14:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants