Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(auditbeat): use correct filetimes field names in some systems #41038

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

kruskall
Copy link
Member

@kruskall kruskall commented Sep 28, 2024

Proposed commit message

fix compile errors on non-linux and openbsd systems

syscall.Stat_t field names is not consistent in different goos causing compile errors on openbsd and non-linux systems

openbsd/riscv still fails to compile but should be fixed once #40132 is merged

Checklist

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have made corresponding change to the default configuration files
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • I have added an entry in CHANGELOG.next.asciidoc or CHANGELOG-developer.next.asciidoc.

Disruptive User Impact

Author's Checklist

  • [ ]

How to test this PR locally

build auditbeat with GOOS=openbsd GOARCH=amd64 go build .

Related issues

Use cases

Screenshots

Logs

fix compile errors on non-linux and openbsd systems

syscall.Stat_t field names is not consistent in different goos causing
compile errors on openbsd and non-linux systems
@kruskall kruskall requested a review from a team as a code owner September 28, 2024 15:38
@botelastic botelastic bot added the needs_team Indicates that the issue/PR needs a Team:* label label Sep 28, 2024
@botelastic
Copy link

botelastic bot commented Sep 28, 2024

This pull request doesn't have a Team:<team> label.

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Sep 28, 2024

This pull request does not have a backport label.
If this is a bug or security fix, could you label this PR @kruskall? 🙏.
For such, you'll need to label your PR with:

  • The upcoming major version of the Elastic Stack
  • The upcoming minor version of the Elastic Stack (if you're not pushing a breaking change)

To fixup this pull request, you need to add the backport labels for the needed
branches, such as:

  • backport-8./d is the label to automatically backport to the 8./d branch. /d is the digit

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Sep 28, 2024

backport-8.x has been added to help with the transition to the new branch 8.x.
If you don't need it please use backport-skip label and remove the backport-8.x label.

@mergify mergify bot added the backport-8.x Automated backport to the 8.x branch with mergify label Sep 28, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport-8.x Automated backport to the 8.x branch with mergify enhancement needs_team Indicates that the issue/PR needs a Team:* label
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant