Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Subsuite status FAILED based on verdict/outcome #61

Closed

Conversation

andmat900
Copy link
Contributor

Applicable Issues

Description of the Change

This change modifies the behavior of the "failed" instance variable. If not set explicitly, it will return true if either verdict or conclusion of the suite is set to FAILED.

Without this change Suite Runner does not handle a case if a sub suite verdict and conclusion are both set to FAILED. In that case the verdict description is: "No description received from ESR or ETR." With this change it is set to "{len(failed)} sub suites failed to start"

Alternate Designs

Possible Drawbacks

Sign-off

Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1

By making a contribution to this project, I certify that:

(a) The contribution was created in whole or in part by me and I
have the right to submit it under the open source license
indicated in the file; or

(b) The contribution is based upon previous work that, to the best
of my knowledge, is covered under an appropriate open source
license and I have the right under that license to submit that
work with modifications, whether created in whole or in part
by me, under the same open source license (unless I am
permitted to submit under a different license), as indicated
in the file; or

(c) The contribution was provided directly to me by some other
person who certified (a), (b) or (c) and I have not modified
it.

(d) I understand and agree that this project and the contribution
are public and that a record of the contribution (including all
personal information I submit with it, including my sign-off) is
maintained indefinitely and may be redistributed consistent with
this project or the open source license(s) involved.

Signed-off-by: Andrei Matveyeu, [email protected]

@andmat900 andmat900 requested a review from a team as a code owner May 27, 2024 12:50
@andmat900 andmat900 requested review from t-persson and fredjn and removed request for a team May 27, 2024 12:50
@andmat900 andmat900 force-pushed the 20240527_custom_verdicts branch from 3d42803 to 03e4079 Compare May 28, 2024 09:58
return self._failed
verdict = self.outcome().get("verdict")
conclusion = self.outcome().get("conclusion")
return "FAILED" in (verdict, conclusion)
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think we should set failed if the verdict is failed. Verdict does not mean that the sub suite failed. It could be a genuine verdict. The verdict of sub suites should be evaluated in the results method in the Suite class. The result will be exactly the same, but it will allow us to do more in the future without editing up here.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This change won't be needed if we proceed with the current proposal of exit code handling/verdict matching in the Test Runner:
https://github.com/eiffel-community/etos-test-runner/pull/49/files

@andmat900 andmat900 closed this Jul 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants