Don't cache instances of TemporaryLoggerFinder

[pshipton]

Fixes #18405

[pshipton]

jenkins compile alinux64 jdk17,jdk21,jdknext

[pshipton]

jenkins compile alinux64 jdk17,jdknext

[pshipton]

jenkins compile alinux64 jdk17,jdknext

[pshipton]

jenkins compile alinux64 jdk17 depends ibmruntimes/openj9-openjdk-jdk17#openj9-staging

[pshipton]

Tested via grinders.

jdk17: https://openj9-jenkins.osuosl.org/view/Test/job/Grinder/3041/
jdk22: https://openj9-jenkins.osuosl.org/view/Test/job/Grinder/3040/

java/lang/System/LoggerFinder/RecursiveLoading/PlatformRecursiveLoadingTest.java  Passed. Execution successful
java/lang/System/LoggerFinder/RecursiveLoading/RecursiveLoadingTest.java          Passed. Execution successful
java/lang/System/LoggerFinder/SignedLoggerFinderTest/SignedLoggerFinderTest.java  Passed. Execution successful

[pshipton]

@keithc-ca this needs to be merged concurrently with promoting jdk17 (i.e. pushing openj9-staging to openj9). Either while we're still at the 17.0.10+1 level, or if we get a newer level then new acceptance testing is required first.

[keithc-ca]

The openj9 branch of jdk17 is also advanced to 1cd3f35fa7e8a5aa460ef71888ccf377c4c4334f.

[pshipton]

The openj9 branch of jdk17 is also advanced to 1cd3f35fa7e8a5aa460ef71888ccf377c4c4334f.

In fact it was not, at least for https://github.com/ibmruntimes/openj9-openjdk-jdk17. All the jdk17 builds failed last night. I've done it now.

[keithc-ca]

I know I pushed it somewhere, perhaps it was to my fork rather than to https://github.com/ibmruntimes/openj9-openjdk-jdk17. Sorry.