Remove binding of NULL to non-pointer variable #7142
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Jenkins build plinux,aix |
keithc-ca
reviewed
Nov 9, 2023
Fix plinux warning concerning a conversion from NULL to intptr_t by removing the initial assignment of variable 'address' to NULL Signed-off-by: Dylan Tuttle <[email protected]>
dylanjtuttle
force-pushed
the
conversionNull
branch
from
5687c35 to
9ee362b
Compare
hzongaro
approved these changes
Nov 9, 2023
|
Jenkins build plinux,aix |
keithc-ca
approved these changes
Nov 9, 2023
|
Builds were successful and reviews signified approval. Merging. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fix plinux warning concerning a conversion from NULL to intptr_t by removing the initial assignment of variable
addressto NULL. Sinceaddressis bound to a value immediately afterwards in both control flow paths through the if-else block which directly follows the variable definition, it's safe to not give it an initial value here.The other instance of this warning will be fixed in openj9 #18244
This PR contributes to (but does not close) openj9 #14859