Add symbol tags as proposed for LSP specification (e.g. visibility tags, static, abstract, etc.) #977 #1149
+379
−45
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Needed to adapt the outline view for visualizing new symbol tags like static, abstract, etc.
|
This would be great it the LSP gets improved and a new version in released. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Start using new symbol tags as proposed in my microsoft/language-server-protocol#2003, for example, adding private, package, protected, and public visibility tags as well as tags like static, final, abstract, read-only, nullable and non-null. Our motivation comes from our wish to add visibility and other symbol details to the outline view (see discussion #977), but maybe also to the call hierarchy and to the type hierarchy or to other related features / LSP operations.
The PR on the LSP specification requires at least one implementation in a language server and / or a client. We plan to finish a first language server implementation in clangd [1] [2] and a first client implementation in LSP4J, LSP4E, and CDT LSP (which is using clangd).
See microsoft/language-server-protocol#2003
and llvm/llvm-project#113669
and eclipse-lsp4j/lsp4j#856