-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 95
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Filter Mechanism for Target in Move Refactoring#18 #1246
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Add Filter Mechanism for Target in Move Refactoring#18 #1246
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have tested the provided functionality and found it to be, as expected, almost equivalent to the one proposed in #981. But since it reuses the existing FilteredTree
, it is much cleaner and avoids duplication.
This implementation does still not perform well on our workspace. Once I stop typing, it takes several seconds to update the viewer. This seems to be because the generic filter logic of FilteredTree
(and the used getChildren()
implementation of the refactoring's content provider) is quite expensive to calculate. But since that is not an issue of newly added functionality but given by the implementation of FilteredTree
, we can address that independently via improvements to FilteredTree
afterwards.
I see one option for slightly improving the behavior when having a large workspace in which the filter update takes a long time: the debounce delay might be increased from FilterTree
's default setting of 200ms, as that value is quite low and can easily be exceeded between two character inputs. The value could be increased to something like 500ms by overwriting FilteredTree.getRefreshJobDelay()
to return an according value.
I would even be in favor of the changes without that modification, as this is a quick win for having a filter mechanism in the move refactoring. And no one is even forced to use it.
....jdt.ui/ui refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/refactoring/reorg/ReorgUserInputPage.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
@HeikoKlare I have applied your suggestion which gives us slightly more time before debouncing. The value for it is 500ms now. There is a pull request in platform.ui which needs to be merged before this PR now. eclipse-platform/eclipse.platform.ui#1824 |
2fde329
to
5085596
Compare
Text Search added to search withing the tree while moving (refactoring) the file to different package eclipse-jdt#1337
5085596
to
2c9ef4c
Compare
@ShahzaibIbrahim I tried a rebased version of this patch on Linux (Fedora 40) via child Eclipse and unfortunately it was unusable for me. After typing I would have to wait a long time for any results to show and I got multiple UI freezes where I had to Wait or Force Quit. This included just showing characters in the text entry when adding or erasing. I tried the alternate version of this patch (#981) and it worked much better for me. Response was reasonable. The only thing I ran into was that typing some characters in and then later removing them all caused a total freeze and I was forced to do a force quit (probably a simple check is missing somewhere for empty text). I also noted that in the original patch, there were markers for discouraged access to various classes rather than using their interfaces (e.g. using JavaProject instead of IJavaProject). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The UI freezes need to be addressed on Linux.
@jjohnstn do you experience similar issues with other usages of |
@HeikoKlare In preferences, using filtering in the top left, filtering in the General->Keys, and the Java->Compiler->Errors/Warnings page all work fine for me without freezing both in my parent Eclipse and my child Eclipse. I didn't confirm if those pages use FilteredTree. |
@ShahzaibIbrahim Have you looked at caching the data, overriding any input provider, so that you prevent a refetch? I imagine the original dialog didn't care about caching because it was only expecting to have the original list and never calling the input provider after that. |
To let user filter the projects or packages from a search bar in a move refactor dialog.
Fixes #1337
What it does
User can now search from the large tree of projects and packages to move the file to.
How to test
Go to any file, right click --> Refactor --> Move --> Dialog Box will open with a treeview of Project and Packages --> Type in the search box and see if the filters are working fine
[x] I have thoroughly tested my changes
[x] The change is following the coding conventions
[x] I have signed the Eclipse Contributor Agreement (ECA)