-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 706
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix LAPACK test failures in OpenBLAS 0.3.23/24 #19495
fix LAPACK test failures in OpenBLAS 0.3.23/24 #19495
Conversation
This combines the patches from @bartoldeman (#18012) and @boegel (#18887) and extends it to the single precision variant which failed on POWER9 the same way the double precision variant failed on AARCH see OpenMathLib/OpenBLAS#4415 Can you run this on your machines to check for regressions? |
Test report by @Flamefire |
@boegelbot please test @ generoso |
@branfosj: Request for testing this PR well received on login1 PR test command '
Test results coming soon (I hope)... - notification for comment with ID 1877403494 processed Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me, |
Test report by @branfosj |
Test report by @boegelbot |
Test report by @branfosj |
@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen2 |
@branfosj: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen2l1.int.jsc-zen2.easybuild-test.cluster PR test command '
Test results coming soon (I hope)... - notification for comment with ID 1877447665 processed Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me, |
Test report by @Flamefire |
Test report by @SebastianAchilles |
Test report by @SebastianAchilles |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Going in, thanks @Flamefire! |
Test report by @boegelbot |
Test report by @Flamefire |
Test report by @boegel |
Test report by @boegel |
(created using
eb --new-pr
)