Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Small improvements to wording and internal linking #1266

Conversation

johnwaterworth
Copy link
Contributor

@johnwaterworth johnwaterworth commented Jan 9, 2024

Improve some wording. Add internal links to new section.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Jan 9, 2024

Deploy Preview for laughing-payne-b9fbd2 ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 6b1a977
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/laughing-payne-b9fbd2/deploys/659e7348c238fd0008d8e015
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1266--laughing-payne-b9fbd2.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@johnwaterworth johnwaterworth changed the title Update User Research page “choosing-and-using-analysis-and-synthesis-methods” Small improvements to wording and internal linking Jan 9, 2024

And we plan the pace of our research to avoid building up analysis and synthesis debt.

Our rule of thumb is “one part research to two parts communication”. For a day spent doing interviews, for example, we expect to spend the next two days on analysis and synthesis, and sharing your findings.
Our rule of thumb is “one part research to two parts communication”. For a day spent doing interviews, for example, we expect to spend the two more days on analysis and synthesis, and sharing findings.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There is an extra 'the' and the 'more' is not needed, in my opinion. This means this sentence could look like this:

"Our rule of thumb is “one part research to two parts communication”. For example, for one day spent doing an interviews, we expect to spend two days on analysis and synthesis, and sharing findings"

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd already removed the stray 'the'. And I've removed the unnecessary 'more'.

Copy link
Contributor

@ZuleimaMR ZuleimaMR left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

in line 26 I still see the word 'more'
"Our rule of thumb is “one part research to two parts communication”. For a day spent doing interviews, for example, we expect to spend two more days on analysis and synthesis, and sharing findings."

In line 30, why are you keeping the word 'findings' at the start of the sentence? "findings and next steps we can justify - as we are often challenged to explain why we have come to those conclusions". Findings are not conclusions and this point seems to be about 'next steps' not findings. Next steps are an outcome of analysis of findings.

@johnwaterworth
Copy link
Contributor Author

Got rid of the 'more' again. That change must have got lost in the Github changes yesterday.

@johnwaterworth
Copy link
Contributor Author

This point is about being able to justify both findings and next steps. As we get challenged on both.
A dictionary definition of conclusions is "a judgement or decision reached by reasoning". So I'm OK using conclusion in this context.

@ZuleimaMR ZuleimaMR merged commit 3e382e8 into main Jan 10, 2024
6 checks passed
@ZuleimaMR ZuleimaMR deleted the cms/user-research/choosing-and-using-analysis-and-synthesis-methods branch January 10, 2024 11:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants