Releases: digicatapult/bridgeAI-regression-model-data-ingestion
Releases · digicatapult/bridgeAI-regression-model-data-ingestion
Release v0.2.2
bugfix: correct check for empty env var (#9) # Pull Request ## Checklist - [x] Have you read Digital Catapult's [Code of Conduct](https://github.com/digicatapult/.github/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md)? - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code. - [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas. - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation. - [x] My changes generate no new warnings. - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works. - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes. ## PR Type - [x] Bug Fix ## Linked tickets <!-- If this PR is linked to a JIRA ticket or Github Issue, please provide the ticket URL here. --> ## High level description The check for empty environment variable was failing because the env variables are passed as empty strings instead of None. ## Detailed description <!-- A detailed description of the feature and if possible describe how has been implemented. --> ## Describe alternatives you've considered <!-- A clear and concise description of the alternative solutions you've considered. Be sure to explain why the existing customisability isn't suitable for this feature. --> ## Operational impact <!--- A description of any operational considerations associated with the change. Is there anything in particular we should be looking at when deploying the change to make sure it is working as intended. If something goes wrong will any special actions be needed to revert the change. --> ## Additional context <!-- Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here. -->
Latest Release v0.2.2
Commits
- correct check for empty env var (#9) #9 (Renjith Baby)
Release v0.2.1
Feature/dvc with aws conn (#8) # Pull Request ## Checklist - [x] Have you read Digital Catapult's [Code of Conduct](https://github.com/digicatapult/.github/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md)? - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code. - [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas. - [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation. - [x] My changes generate no new warnings. - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works. - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes. ## PR Type Please delete options that are irrelevant. - [x] Feature ## Linked tickets <!-- If this PR is linked to a JIRA ticket or Github Issue, please provide the ticket URL here. --> ## High level description <!-- One paragraph explanation of the feature. --> ## Detailed description <!-- A detailed description of the feature and if possible describe how has been implemented. --> ## Describe alternatives you've considered <!-- A clear and concise description of the alternative solutions you've considered. Be sure to explain why the existing customisability isn't suitable for this feature. --> ## Operational impact <!--- A description of any operational considerations associated with the change. Is there anything in particular we should be looking at when deploying the change to make sure it is working as intended. If something goes wrong will any special actions be needed to revert the change. --> ## Additional context <!-- Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here. -->
Release v0.2.0
Using dockerhub and ghcr (#7) # Pull Request ## Checklist - [X] Have you read Digital Catapult's [Code of Conduct](https://github.com/digicatapult/.github/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md)? - [X] I have performed a self-review of my own code. - [X] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas. - [X] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation. - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings. - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works. - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes. ## PR Type Please delete options that are irrelevant. - [X] Chore ## Linked tickets N/A ## High level description Adds ability to push to dockerhub ## Detailed description Alters the publish step so that we release container artifacts to dockerhub as well as GHCR so people can pull without requiring GHCR authentication. ## Describe alternatives you've considered N/A ## Operational impact N/A ## Additional context N/A
Release v0.1.4
update version increment and add unit tests for the same (#6) * update version increment and add unit tests for the same * increment version
Release v0.1.3
introduce env var for dvc endpoint url (#5) * introduce env var for dvc endpoint url * increment version
Release v0.1.2
update readme - remove unused docker compose command (#4) * update readme - remove unused docker compose command * undo code changes - keeping for another pr * increment version * fix readme formatting
Release v0.1.1
dvc push - fix and readme update (#3) * fix git checkout when branch doesn't exist * fix the tag with data- prefix * fix git checkout function * update version * update version check workflow * update dvc push to s3 minio bucket * update readme
Release 0.1.0
Feature/data ingestion (#1) * add initial repo skeleton * add pytest * add basic pipeline with git - no remote set * add data to dvc * complete pipeline till data split * fix logging mistake * add details of the manual dvc push in the readme * add data push module * reformat * add unit and integration tests * review changes - git workflows * update the dvc integration test