Tech: massive gems updates #11136
Merged
Tech: massive gems updates #11136
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #11136 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 84.47% 84.47% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 1186 1186
Lines 26240 26238 -2
Branches 4946 4942 -4
==========================================
- Hits 22167 22165 -2
Misses 4073 4073 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
LeSim
approved these changes
Dec 17, 2024
github-merge-queue
bot
removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks
Merged
via the queue into
demarches-simplifiees:main
with commit Dec 17, 2024
d837291
18 checks passed
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
pour le moment seulement minor & patch releases
Je ferai dans une autre PR
active_storage_validationspour discuter car ça lève des erreurs dans les tests