Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Correctif, ETQ Tech, je souhaite que la tache qui peuple les adresses normalisées des champs siret ne plante pas a cause de bad data sur les champs #10714

Conversation

mfo
Copy link
Contributor

@mfo mfo commented Aug 26, 2024

on a des champs sans dossiers, on rescue une err de validation dans cette maintenance task [bloqué a 1M de champs, reste a faire 400k]
cf: https://www.demarches-simplifiees.fr/manager/maintenance_tasks/tasks/Maintenance::PopulateSiretValueJSONTask

Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 26, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 84.58%. Comparing base (8e7e8d9) to head (03a72cc).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #10714      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   84.59%   84.58%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files        1118     1118              
  Lines       24769    24769              
  Branches     4608     4608              
==========================================
- Hits        20953    20950       -3     
- Misses       3816     3819       +3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@mfo mfo added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 26, 2024
Merged via the queue into demarches-simplifiees:main with commit 340828c Aug 26, 2024
18 checks passed
@mfo mfo deleted the US/fix-populate-siret-value-json-missing-dossier branch August 26, 2024 08:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants