Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

evaluation components - use API keys in tests #596

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 18, 2024
Merged

evaluation components - use API keys in tests #596

merged 2 commits into from
Mar 18, 2024

Conversation

anakin87
Copy link
Member

part of #595

@anakin87 anakin87 marked this pull request as ready for review March 18, 2024 15:56
@anakin87 anakin87 requested a review from a team as a code owner March 18, 2024 15:56
@anakin87 anakin87 requested review from vblagoje, masci, a team and shadeMe and removed request for a team March 18, 2024 15:56
masci
masci approved these changes Mar 18, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@masci masci left a comment •
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some tests expected to fail for unrelated reasons

@anakin87 anakin87 merged commit 1c31530 into main Mar 18, 2024
15 of 21 checks passed
@anakin87 anakin87 deleted the evaluation-use-api-key branch March 18, 2024 15:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@masci masci masci approved these changes

@vblagoje vblagoje Awaiting requested review from vblagoje vblagoje is a code owner automatically assigned from deepset-ai/open-source-engineering

@shadeMe shadeMe Awaiting requested review from shadeMe shadeMe is a code owner automatically assigned from deepset-ai/open-source-engineering

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
integration:deepeval integration:ragas integration:uptrain topic:CI
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@anakin87 @masci