Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ut: add null test #3391

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 3, 2024
Merged

ut: add null test #3391

merged 2 commits into from
Mar 3, 2024

Conversation

wanghan-iapcm
Copy link
Collaborator

test the cases:

  1. system only has one atom
  2. system has two atoms that are far away from each other.

In each cases, the force and virial predictions should be zero and energy should be a valid float.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 2, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 76.59%. Comparing base (f4abe12) to head (a7ec2d0).
Report is 8 commits behind head on devel.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##            devel    #3391      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   76.57%   76.59%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         420      420              
  Lines       35682    35754      +72     
  Branches     1620     1620              
==========================================
+ Hits        27323    27387      +64     
- Misses       7491     7499       +8     
  Partials      868      868              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@njzjz njzjz added the Test CUDA Trigger test CUDA workflow label Mar 2, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the Test CUDA Trigger test CUDA workflow label Mar 2, 2024
@njzjz njzjz added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 3, 2024
Merged via the queue into deepmodeling:devel with commit 4f933d8 Mar 3, 2024
48 checks passed
@wanghan-iapcm wanghan-iapcm deleted the test-null branch March 4, 2024 03:08
@njzjz njzjz mentioned this pull request Apr 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants