Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: add cardinality to CteScan explain #14310

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 12, 2024

Conversation

xudong963
Copy link
Member

@xudong963 xudong963 commented Jan 12, 2024

I hereby agree to the terms of the CLA available at: https://docs.databend.com/dev/policies/cla/

Summary

add cardinality to CteScan explain

Tests

  • Unit Test
  • Logic Test
  • Benchmark Test
  • No Test - Explain why

Type of change

  • Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking Change (fix or feature that could cause existing functionality not to work as expected)
  • Documentation Update
  • Refactoring
  • Performance Improvement
  • Other (please describe):

This change is Reviewable

@github-actions github-actions bot added the pr-refactor this PR changes the code base without new features or bugfix label Jan 12, 2024
@xudong963 xudong963 requested a review from Dousir9 January 12, 2024 06:50
@xudong963 xudong963 enabled auto-merge January 12, 2024 07:11
@xudong963 xudong963 added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 12, 2024
@BohuTANG BohuTANG removed this pull request from the merge queue due to a manual request Jan 12, 2024
@BohuTANG BohuTANG merged commit 17421b6 into databendlabs:main Jan 12, 2024
72 checks passed
@xudong963 xudong963 deleted the cte_scan_explain branch January 12, 2024 07:28
Xuanwo pushed a commit to Xuanwo/databend that referenced this pull request Jan 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
pr-refactor this PR changes the code base without new features or bugfix
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants