Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow to run arbitrary commands in containers using cross-util run ... #1280

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 27, 2023

Conversation

lumasepa
Copy link
Contributor

Implementation for #1266

@lumasepa lumasepa requested a review from a team as a code owner June 22, 2023 15:59
src/bin/commands/run.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@lumasepa lumasepa force-pushed the feature/allow-to-run-arbitrary-commands branch from 1fb1f17 to f09361c Compare June 22, 2023 16:15
@lumasepa lumasepa changed the title Allow to run arbitrary commands in conainers using cross-util run ... Allow to run arbitrary commands in containers using cross-util run ... Jun 22, 2023
@lumasepa lumasepa force-pushed the feature/allow-to-run-arbitrary-commands branch 2 times, most recently from 9623db9 to 278c3ea Compare June 22, 2023 16:49
@lumasepa lumasepa force-pushed the feature/allow-to-run-arbitrary-commands branch from 278c3ea to be92c3f Compare June 22, 2023 16:55
Copy link
Member

@Emilgardis Emilgardis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

awesome, some pointers

src/bin/commands/run.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/bin/commands/run.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@lumasepa lumasepa force-pushed the feature/allow-to-run-arbitrary-commands branch from 7e46941 to 00c39a6 Compare June 23, 2023 10:45
@lumasepa
Copy link
Contributor Author

The changelog check is failing, I added a line in the changelog. Any suggestions on how to fix it?

@Emilgardis
Copy link
Member

Emilgardis commented Jun 23, 2023

See https://github.com/cross-rs/cross/blob/main/.changes/README.md for how to make a changelog entry :)

Copy link
Member

@Emilgardis Emilgardis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm! fix the changeog and this should be good to go!

@lumasepa lumasepa force-pushed the feature/allow-to-run-arbitrary-commands branch from 00c39a6 to 1aab4cf Compare June 26, 2023 08:08
@lumasepa
Copy link
Contributor Author

See https://github.com/cross-rs/cross/blob/main/.changes/README.md for how to make a changelog entry :)

Thanks, done 😄

Copy link
Member

@Emilgardis Emilgardis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

awesome! thank you :)

bors r+

bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 27, 2023
1280: Allow to run arbitrary commands in containers using cross-util run ... r=Emilgardis a=lumasepa

Implementation for #1266

Co-authored-by: Sergio Medina <[email protected]>
@Emilgardis Emilgardis added the no-ci-targets PRs that do not affect any cross-compilation targets. label Jun 27, 2023
@Emilgardis
Copy link
Member

I keep forgetting some targets are broken...

bors cancel

bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors bot commented Jun 27, 2023

Canceled.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors bot commented Jun 27, 2023

Build succeeded!

The publicly hosted instance of bors-ng is deprecated and will go away soon.

If you want to self-host your own instance, instructions are here.
For more help, visit the forum.

If you want to switch to GitHub's built-in merge queue, visit their help page.

@bors bors bot merged commit 1511a28 into cross-rs:main Jun 27, 2023
@kingosticks kingosticks mentioned this pull request Aug 24, 2023
1 task
@Emilgardis Emilgardis added this to the v0.3.0 milestone Nov 1, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
no-ci-targets PRs that do not affect any cross-compilation targets.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants