Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix Typographical Errors #7786

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Dec 22, 2024
Merged

Fix Typographical Errors #7786

merged 10 commits into from
Dec 22, 2024

Conversation

Pricstas
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request fixes several typographical errors in various Go files, enhancing the clarity and accuracy of code comments and documentation. These changes include correcting minor grammatical issues, such as redundant phrases and incorrect wording, across multiple modules and files.

Changes Made:

  1. Corrected typographical errors in code comments and documentation:

    • Improved clarity in statements such as "check if there is a allowed address list" to "check if there is an allowed address list."
  2. Updated function comments and documentation for better readability and consistency.

These updates help maintain the overall quality and readability of the codebase, ensuring that the comments are informative and free from errors.

Checklist:

  • Targeted PR against the correct branch.
  • Linked to GitHub issue with discussion and accepted design.
  • Code follows the module structure standards and Go style guide.
  • Unit and integration tests have been written.
  • Relevant documentation (docs/) has been updated.
  • Added relevant godoc comments.
  • Conventional commit message is provided.

Please ensure all checklist items have been reviewed and completed before merging.

Copy link
Contributor

@gjermundgaraba gjermundgaraba left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you :)

@gjermundgaraba gjermundgaraba merged commit 6c41505 into cosmos:main Dec 22, 2024
80 of 81 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants