-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 380
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
OCI layout extensions #2633
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
OCI layout extensions #2633
Conversation
In draft for now. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just a quick skim; I’m afraid I didn’t read the added tests yet.
ae7457e
to
234b45f
Compare
I'd love to have some explicit test condition on Linux to make sure that the reflinking works. We're using the function from c/storage which is e2e tested. The unit tests run on tmp, so we have to create the test dirs in $HOME ... not sure we should though. |
Images in the index can now be referenced via the @sourceIndex syntax. Signed-off-by: Miloslav Trmač <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <[email protected]>
The new API allows for listing all manifests in an OCI layout's index. Signed-off-by: Miloslav Trmač <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <[email protected]>
Try to reflink the file and restort to copying it in case of failure. Also add an Options struct to be future proof. Signed-off-by: Miloslav Trmač <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <[email protected]>
234b45f
to
6481647
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actual detailed review still pending, I’m afraid.
@@ -18,10 +18,12 @@ import ( | |||
"github.com/containers/image/v5/internal/private" | |||
"github.com/containers/image/v5/internal/putblobdigest" | |||
"github.com/containers/image/v5/types" | |||
reflinkCopy "github.com/containers/storage/drivers/copy" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This drags in quite a few dependencies:
+github.com/containers/storage/drivers/copy
+github.com/containers/storage/pkg/archive
+github.com/containers/storage/pkg/chrootarchive
+github.com/containers/storage/pkg/idtools
+github.com/containers/storage/pkg/ioutils
+github.com/containers/storage/pkg/longpath
+github.com/containers/storage/pkg/mount
+github.com/containers/storage/pkg/pools
+github.com/containers/storage/pkg/promise
+github.com/containers/storage/pkg/reexec
+github.com/containers/storage/pkg/system
+github.com/containers/storage/pkg/unshare
+# github.com/docker/go-units v0.5.0
+## explicit
+github.com/docker/go-units
+# github.com/json-iterator/go v1.1.12
+## explicit; go 1.12
+github.com/json-iterator/go
+# github.com/klauspost/compress v1.17.11
+## explicit; go 1.21
+github.com/klauspost/compress
+github.com/klauspost/compress/flate
+github.com/klauspost/compress/fse
+github.com/klauspost/compress/huff0
+github.com/klauspost/compress/internal/cpuinfo
+github.com/klauspost/compress/internal/snapref
+github.com/klauspost/compress/zstd
+github.com/klauspost/compress/zstd/internal/xxhash
+# github.com/klauspost/pgzip v1.2.6
+## explicit
+github.com/klauspost/pgzip
+# github.com/moby/sys/capability v0.3.0
+## explicit; go 1.21
+github.com/moby/sys/capability
+# github.com/moby/sys/mountinfo v0.7.2
+## explicit; go 1.17
+github.com/moby/sys/mountinfo
+# github.com/moby/sys/user v0.3.0
+## explicit; go 1.17
+github.com/moby/sys/user
+# github.com/modern-go/concurrent v0.0.0-20180306012644-bacd9c7ef1dd
+## explicit
+github.com/modern-go/concurrent
+# github.com/modern-go/reflect2 v1.0.2
+## explicit; go 1.12
+github.com/modern-go/reflect2
+# github.com/opencontainers/runtime-spec v1.2.0
+## explicit
+github.com/opencontainers/runtime-spec/specs-go
+# github.com/ulikunitz/xz v0.5.12
+## explicit; go 1.12
+github.com/ulikunitz/xz
+github.com/ulikunitz/xz/internal/hash
+github.com/ulikunitz/xz/internal/xlog
+github.com/ulikunitz/xz/lzma
Podman itself does not care, but podman-remote
might, and out-of-Podman OCI-specific utilities probably do.
Can only the relevant code be split into a subpackage in c/storage?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
AFAIUI, the following lines are the ones we need:
https://github.com/containers/storage/blob/main/drivers/copy/copy_linux.go#L51-L54
Couldn't we move that into the code here?
Cc: @giuseppe
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Will be better on the next push since I moved the few lines into c/image/internal/reflink.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A full review now.
@@ -148,11 +148,17 @@ func testParseReference(t *testing.T, fn func(string) (types.ImageReference, err | |||
"relativepath", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Holding the line at “all of *_transport.go
should have test coverage”, please port the two test cases added to TestGetManifestDescriptor
from #1677 (and then see if more need to be added).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Isn't that already being tested now with fixtures/two_images_manifest
?
require.Equal(t, test.names[i], ociRef.image) | ||
if test.names[i] != "" { | ||
require.True(t, strings.HasSuffix(res.Reference.StringWithinTransport(), test.names[i])) | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
else
test that res.Reference
is a sourceIndex reference with the right index?
Or, alternatively, use the returned reference to read a manifest and verify that it matches res.ManifestDescriptor.Digest
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we are doing that above, aren't we?
} | ||
blobName := blobFile.Name() | ||
|
||
copyRange := false |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is there a reason we would not want to use this?
…
Tests writing to non-test directories , and possibly leaving them around on aborts/failures, seems rather unexpected to me, some might consider it (or, at least, be worried that it is) hostile. So I’d prefer to leave this to e2e tests, maybe the future tests of the Podman artifact CLI. (Just because I was looking it up, Google says reflinks don’t work on ext4. That’s not really a blocker, we could gate this behind a filesystem type check.) |
Vendor containers/image/pull/2633 and update the code so we can start testing it. Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <[email protected]>
Taken over from #2567 but: