Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix usage of InstantiateTemplate #217

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 5, 2024

Conversation

aaronj0
Copy link
Collaborator

@aaronj0 aaronj0 commented Apr 4, 2024

renames missed name change in ScopeReflectionTest (PR #128)

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 4, 2024

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍"

Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 4, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 78.80%. Comparing base (d5bef3c) to head (e02969e).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #217      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   78.41%   78.80%   +0.38%     
==========================================
  Files           8        8              
  Lines        3100     3100              
==========================================
+ Hits         2431     2443      +12     
+ Misses        669      657      -12     

see 1 file with indirect coverage changes

see 1 file with indirect coverage changes

@aaronj0
Copy link
Collaborator Author

aaronj0 commented Apr 4, 2024

@vgvassilev this should fix the failing jobs on main

@aaronj0 aaronj0 changed the title Rename usage of InstantiateTemplate Fix usage of InstantiateTemplate Apr 4, 2024
@vgvassilev vgvassilev merged commit 32efeba into compiler-research:main Apr 5, 2024
44 checks passed
@aaronj0 aaronj0 deleted the rename-patch branch April 22, 2024 12:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants