Doxygen documentation regeneration

[vgvassilev]

Looks like our documentation does not pick up the doxygen style comments: https://cppinterop.readthedocs.io/en/latest/build/html/index.html

I am not sure if that's a feature or we are just not regenerating the documentation.

[mcbarton]

I think this could be added as part of the nightly builds on the ci. We could add something that builds the documentation, and pushes the changes to this webpage.

[vgvassilev]

I think this could be added as part of the nightly builds on the ci. We could add something that builds the documentation, and pushes the changes to this webpage.

I believe that was part of the readthedocs website infrastructure. I just was not sure if the problem was the way we build our documentation or if we are not triggering new builds.

In #246 we landed a new interface and it seems to be showing there which means we regenerate the documentation but we do not take the comments...

[vgvassilev]

We seem to have hit some bug because all interface documentation is attached to the attribute() : https://cppinterop.readthedocs.io/en/latest/build/html/namespaceCpp.html#a3ef57f5fc1b6bf7e59bc40e340fd2be6

[github-actions]

This issue is stale because it has been open for 90 days with no activity.

[mcbarton]

This was fixed by #381