Append entries endpoint

[renancloudwalk]

No description provided.

[github-actions]

PR Review 🔍

⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]	2, because the PR involves a moderate amount of changes with the addition of a new RPC method and its corresponding implementation in the blockchain client. The changes are straightforward and localized to specific parts of the codebase.
🧪 Relevant tests	No
⚡ Possible issues	Possible Bug: The new RPC method stratus_append_entries might not handle different types of input or errors in the Params. It currently just returns a fixed response, which might not be adequate for all use cases.
🔒 Security concerns	No

Code feedback:

---

relevant file	src/eth/rpc/rpc_server.rs
suggestion	Consider adding error handling or input validation for the stratus_append_entries method to ensure it can manage different types of input and respond appropriately to erroneous data. [important]
relevant line	Ok(json!(true))

---

relevant file	src/infra/blockchain_client/client.rs
suggestion	Ensure that the entries variable in append_entries method is properly serialized and handled in case of serialization errors. You might want to add error handling around the serde_json::to_value(entries)?; to manage serialization failures gracefully. [important]
relevant line	let entries = serde_json::to_value(entries)?;

---

[github-actions]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Category	Suggestion	Score
Best practice	Add detailed error handling for the append_entries request Ensure that the error from the request method is properly handled. Currently, the method call is followed by a ?, which will propagate the error, but it might be beneficial to add specific error handling or logging to provide more context about the failure. src/infra/blockchain_client/client.rs [92] -self.http.request::<(), Vec<JsonValue>>("stratus_appendEntries", vec![entries]).await?; +self.http.request::<(), Vec<JsonValue>>("stratus_appendEntries", vec![entries]).await + .map_err(|e| { + tracing::error!("Failed to append entries: {}", e); + e + })?; Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9 Why: Adding detailed error handling and logging can significantly improve debugging and maintenance, making it easier to identify and resolve issues related to the append_entries request.	9
Enhancement	Suggest adding implementation details for stratus_append_entries The function stratus_append_entries currently returns a static JSON value. If this function is intended to handle more complex logic or return dynamic data, consider implementing the necessary logic or indicating that further implementation is needed. src/eth/rpc/rpc_server.rs [234] +// Placeholder for actual implementation +// TODO: Implement the logic for append entries Ok(json!(true)) Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: The suggestion correctly identifies that the function currently returns a static value and suggests adding a placeholder for future implementation, which can improve code clarity and future development.	7
Maintainability	Enhance logging for better traceability of the append entries process Consider adding more detailed logging before making the HTTP request to append entries. This can help in debugging and understanding the flow of data, especially when dealing with complex data structures. src/infra/blockchain_client/client.rs [90] -tracing::debug!(?entries, "appending entries"); +tracing::debug!(?entries, "Preparing to append entries"); +tracing::debug!("Making HTTP request to 'stratus_appendEntries'"); Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 Why: While the suggestion to enhance logging can improve traceability and debugging, it is a minor improvement and not crucial for the functionality of the code.	6