Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: block-miner automine checks #851

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 15, 2024
Merged

refactor: block-miner automine checks #851

merged 2 commits into from
May 15, 2024

Conversation

dinhani-cw
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@dinhani-cw dinhani-cw requested a review from a team as a code owner May 15, 2024 20:21
Copy link

PR Review 🔍

⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]

3, because the PR involves changes across multiple files and includes both logic refactoring and behavior modifications. Understanding the implications of these changes on the system's functionality and ensuring no regression or side effects would require a moderate level of effort.

🧪 Relevant tests

No

⚡ Possible issues

Possible Bug: The method spawn_interval_miner in block_miner.rs uses a pattern matching on self.block_time that might not compile as expected in Rust. The syntax used for the match seems incorrect and could lead to compilation errors.

🔒 Security concerns

No

Code feedback:
relevant filesrc/eth/block_miner.rs
suggestion      

Correct the syntax for pattern matching in spawn_interval_miner. Use proper Rust syntax for destructuring Option types. This change is important to avoid runtime errors and ensure the function behaves as expected. [important]

relevant linelet Some(block_time) = self.block_time else {

relevant filesrc/eth/executor.rs
suggestion      

Consider adding a debug or info log statement in the new method of Executor to log the state of automine when the executor is initialized. This will help in debugging and understanding the flow of mining operations during runtime. [medium]

relevant linelet automine = miner.is_automine_mode();

Copy link

PR Code Suggestions ✨

CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
Possible bug
Correct the syntax error by using the correct negation operator

Replace the usage of not with ! for negating boolean expressions in Rust. The not keyword
is not valid Rust syntax for negation.

src/eth/block_miner.rs [70]

-not(self.is_interval_miner_mode())
+!self.is_interval_miner_mode()
 
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 10

Why: The suggestion correctly identifies a syntax error in the PR code and provides the correct Rust syntax for negation, which is crucial for the code to compile.

10

@dinhani-cw dinhani-cw enabled auto-merge (squash) May 15, 2024 20:31
@dinhani-cw dinhani-cw merged commit 5b7fe6f into main May 15, 2024
25 checks passed
@dinhani-cw dinhani-cw deleted the miner branch May 15, 2024 20:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants