Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: do not cancel importer when finished loading all blocks #761

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 3, 2024

Conversation

dinhani-cw
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@dinhani-cw dinhani-cw requested a review from a team as a code owner May 3, 2024 02:58
Copy link

github-actions bot commented May 3, 2024

PR Review

⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]

2, because the changes are localized to a specific part of the code and involve a straightforward logic modification. The PR is small and the context of the change is clear, making it easier to review.

🧪 Relevant tests

No

🔍 Possible issues

Possible Bug: The removal of cancellation.cancel(); might lead to unintended behavior if other parts of the system rely on this cancellation signal to stop processing or clean up resources.

🔒 Security concerns

No

Code feedback:

✨ Review tool usage guide:

Overview:
The review tool scans the PR code changes, and generates a PR review which includes several types of feedbacks, such as possible PR issues, security threats and relevant test in the PR. More feedbacks can be added by configuring the tool.

The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on any PR.

  • When commenting, to edit configurations related to the review tool (pr_reviewer section), use the following template:
/review --pr_reviewer.some_config1=... --pr_reviewer.some_config2=...
[pr_reviewer]
some_config1=...
some_config2=...

See the review usage page for a comprehensive guide on using this tool.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented May 3, 2024

PR Code Suggestions

CategorySuggestions                                                                                                                                                       
Bug
Correct the pattern matching syntax to prevent compilation errors.

The pattern matching syntax used is incorrect and will cause a compilation error. Rust
uses if let or match for pattern matching. Here, you should use if let to handle the
option returned by tasks.next().await.

src/bin/importer_offline.rs [209-211]

-let Some(result) = tasks.next().await else {
+if let Some(result) = tasks.next().await {
+    // process result
+} else {
     break "no more blocks to process";
-};
+}
 

✨ Improve tool usage guide:

Overview:
The improve tool scans the PR code changes, and automatically generates suggestions for improving the PR code. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on a PR.

  • When commenting, to edit configurations related to the improve tool (pr_code_suggestions section), use the following template:
/improve --pr_code_suggestions.some_config1=... --pr_code_suggestions.some_config2=...
[pr_code_suggestions]
some_config1=...
some_config2=...

See the improve usage page for a comprehensive guide on using this tool.

@dinhani-cw dinhani-cw enabled auto-merge (squash) May 3, 2024 03:00
@dinhani-cw dinhani-cw merged commit b4c6168 into main May 3, 2024
25 checks passed
@dinhani-cw dinhani-cw deleted the importer-offline branch May 3, 2024 03:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant