Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remove repetitive words #1224

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion cmd/cloudflared/access/cmd.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -505,7 +505,7 @@ func isFileThere(candidate string) bool {
}

// verifyTokenAtEdge checks for a token on disk, or generates a new one.
// Then makes a request to to the origin with the token to ensure it is valid.
// Then makes a request to the origin with the token to ensure it is valid.
// Returns nil if token is valid.
func verifyTokenAtEdge(appUrl *url.URL, appInfo *token.AppInfo, c *cli.Context, log *zerolog.Logger) error {
headers := parseRequestHeaders(c.StringSlice(sshHeaderFlag))
Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion h2mux/sample/index2.html
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ <h4 id="firstflawanadministrativeprocessevenanoriginalistcanlove">First Flaw: An

<h4 id="secondflawthejudicialrolewaslimited">Second Flaw: The Judicial Role was Limited</h4>

<p>Not only did British courts share the power to address patent rights historically, the part shared by the the courts was significantly limited. Historically, the common-law and chancery courts only received a partial delegation of the Privy Council’s authority to invalidate patents. Courts only had the authority to invalidate patents for issues related to things like inequitable conduct (e.g., making false statements in the original patent application). The limited authority delegated to the England Courts did not include the authority to seek claim <em>cancellation</em> based on elements intrinsic to the patent or patent application, like lack of novelty or obviousness as done under an IPR proceeding. Rather, such authority remained with the Privy Council, a non-court authority, which decided questions like whether the invention was really new. Thus, like the PTAB, the Privy Council was a non-judicial body charged with responsibility to assess patent validity based on criteria that included the novelty of the invention.</p>
<p>Not only did British courts share the power to address patent rights historically, the part shared by the courts was significantly limited. Historically, the common-law and chancery courts only received a partial delegation of the Privy Council’s authority to invalidate patents. Courts only had the authority to invalidate patents for issues related to things like inequitable conduct (e.g., making false statements in the original patent application). The limited authority delegated to the England Courts did not include the authority to seek claim <em>cancellation</em> based on elements intrinsic to the patent or patent application, like lack of novelty or obviousness as done under an IPR proceeding. Rather, such authority remained with the Privy Council, a non-court authority, which decided questions like whether the invention was really new. Thus, like the PTAB, the Privy Council was a non-judicial body charged with responsibility to assess patent validity based on criteria that included the novelty of the invention.</p>

<p>We think these arguments are compelling and provide very strong reasons why the Supreme Court should resist the request that such matters be resolved exclusively in federal courts. We hope that’s the position they do take because the real world implications are significant. </p>

Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion management/events.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ func (e *LogEventType) UnmarshalJSON(data []byte) error {

// LogLevel corresponds to the zerolog logging levels
// "panic", "fatal", and "trace" are exempt from this list as they are rarely used and, at least
// the the first two are limited to failure conditions that lead to cloudflared shutting down.
// the first two are limited to failure conditions that lead to cloudflared shutting down.
type LogLevel int8

const (
Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion retry/backoffhandler.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ func (b *BackoffHandler) Backoff(ctx context.Context) bool {
}
}

// Sets a grace period within which the the backoff timer is maintained. After the grace
// Sets a grace period within which the backoff timer is maintained. After the grace
// period expires, the number of retries & backoff duration is reset.
func (b *BackoffHandler) SetGracePeriod() time.Duration {
maxTimeToWait := b.GetBaseTime() * 2 << (b.retries + 1)
Expand Down