Revert #bd7de274214a21b378f6b830d730105864f51661 #65
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
So when I made this PR #60 I hallucinated a bit. sbctl is not needed.
When I was updating my old script, I did notice that there was an error with sbctl not existing. This only happens when you try to pacstrap both the kernel and sbctl in the same command. sbctl will add a hook to autosign the kernel, but it cannot do it because the user has not created the key.
Since your intention is not to bother with secure boot anyways, there's no need for sbctl.