docs: Fix "implmentation" typo

My fingers apparently want to do the wrong thing here

Signed-off-by: Colin Walters <[email protected]>

docs/src/filesystem-storage.md

@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ The flattened tree is constructed and committed into the
 `ostree/container/image` namespace.  The commit metadata also includes
 the OCI manifest and config objects.
 
-This is implmented in the [ostree-rs-ext/container module](https://docs.rs/ostree-ext/latest/ostree_ext/container/index.html).
+This is implemented in the [ostree-rs-ext/container module](https://docs.rs/ostree-ext/latest/ostree_ext/container/index.html).
 
 ### SELinux labeling
 

docs/src/filesystem.md

@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ across upgrades.  In a nutshell:
 - The diff between current and previous `/etc` is applied to the new `/etc`
 - Locally modified files in `/etc` different from the default `/usr/etc` (of the same deployment) will be retained
 
-The implmentation of this defaults to being executed by `ostree-finalize-staged.service`
+The implementation of this defaults to being executed by `ostree-finalize-staged.service`
 at shutdown time, before the new bootloader entry is created.
 
 The rationale for this design is that in practice today, many components of a Linux system end up shipping
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ For more on configuration file best practices, see [Building](building/guidance.
 ### `/usr/etc`
 
 The `/usr/etc` tree is generated client side and contains the default container image's
-view of `/etc`. This should generally be considered an internal implmentation detail
+view of `/etc`. This should generally be considered an internal implementation detail
 of bootc/ostree. Do *not* explicitly put files into this location, it can create
 undefined behavior. There is a check for this in `bootc container lint`.