Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement private key size annotation #48

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 14, 2023

Conversation

snorwin
Copy link
Contributor

@snorwin snorwin commented Nov 27, 2023

This PR introduces a new feature that allows users to specify the private key size in the Route resource, similar to the functionality currently available for the Ingress resource. With the increasing shift away from the default RSA key size of 2048, which is often no longer supported or used, this addition provides users with the flexibility to define a key size that aligns with their security requirements and best practices.

@jetstack-bot jetstack-bot added dco-signoff: no Indicates that at least one commit in this pull request is missing the DCO sign-off message. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Nov 27, 2023
@jetstack-bot jetstack-bot added dco-signoff: yes Indicates that all commits in the pull request have the valid DCO sign-off message. and removed dco-signoff: no Indicates that at least one commit in this pull request is missing the DCO sign-off message. labels Nov 27, 2023
@snorwin
Copy link
Contributor Author

snorwin commented Dec 1, 2023

@jacksgt would be really appreciated if you could quickly have a look at this PR.

@maelvls
Copy link
Member

maelvls commented Dec 1, 2023

Hey, great work!! I don't have a lot of experience in private key sizes, but I am confident that it will work for people since it looks similar to how cert-manager does (csr.go).

@jacksgt Please feel free to review the PR too! 🙏

/approve

@jetstack-bot jetstack-bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 1, 2023
@snorwin
Copy link
Contributor Author

snorwin commented Dec 13, 2023

@maelvls if there are no further changes required, would you be able to merge the PR and consider releasing it?

@maelvls
Copy link
Member

maelvls commented Dec 14, 2023

/approve
/lgtm

Yes, let's have it released!

@jetstack-bot jetstack-bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 14, 2023
@jetstack-bot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: maelvls

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@jetstack-bot jetstack-bot merged commit 29edd5a into cert-manager:main Dec 14, 2023
3 checks passed
@snorwin
Copy link
Contributor Author

snorwin commented Dec 14, 2023

Thank you! Very much appreciated 😄

@snorwin snorwin deleted the keysize-annotation branch December 18, 2023 07:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. dco-signoff: yes Indicates that all commits in the pull request have the valid DCO sign-off message. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants