Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Contributing update README.md #108
Contributing update README.md #108
Changes from 2 commits
ef7bdf4
2258dba
232d6d0
8d437a1
e9ee044
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do you think it'd make more sense to discourage people from editing it directly? Sort of defeats the purpose of this automation IMO.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes. I do. I think this is a hacky use case as you mention in your other comment. I think the follow-on issue will address that, and the README will need to be updated when it's done.
For now though, I think it's best to document the action as it is today, seeing as it's already merged and this is how it actually works.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Come on, even describing this feels super hacky 😂 I'd be all for setting this behaviour as the default though. I believe it's much better than either encouraging people to edit the
contributing.md
directly or manually directing the rendered file PR towards the one updating the inputs.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmmm. You're right. I think it would be as simple as this: instead of targeting
main
, just target "Whatever branch you are currently on".However, targeting
main
is how it works today :(I really don't want to allow the scope of this PR to extend beyond simply updating the README to reflect the state of the already-merged action.
So, I've created an issue to change the action as you suggested: #109.
And then for this PR, I suggest we focus just on documenting the action as it is today.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually, I may be wrong. I'm testing this out. I see from the PR action we're using that the default branch is the one from which the action is called:
So I'm testing this out in this workflow run.