-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Subscription & events for Commonalities 0.5.0 #313
Conversation
Add SUBSCRIPTION_UNPROCESSABLE in terminationReason enum for subscription ends event. Solve camaraproject#243
Explicit subscription-end termination reason usage. Fix camaraproject#243
Update the "sink" property description Fix camaraproject#289
Update the "sink" property descriptionFix camaraproject#289
Add information for exiresAT + limitation to subscriptionMaxEvent and subscriptionExpireTime. Fixes camaraproject#303
fix line 1757
Proposal for camaraproject#276 - POST /subscriptions response will have only `id` - removed `sinkCredentials` from GET representation
Add a note on combined usage of initialEvent and subscriptionMaxEvents (camaraproject#299)
Add part for: - camaraproject#304 - camaraproject#299 - partial camaraproject#295
Fixe line 1580
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
18/OCT:
Fine to me so far. Editorial suggestions only
Co-authored-by: Pedro Díez García <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Pedro Díez García <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Pedro Díez García <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Pedro Díez García <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Pedro Díez García <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Pedro Díez García <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Pedro Díez García <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Pedro Díez García <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Pedro Díez García <[email protected]>
Highlight Subscription status value table
Add link to artifacts/camara-cloudevents/event-subscription-template.yaml
Fix link
Thanks you Pedro ! |
- If 3-legged access token is used, the POST and GET responses must not provide any device identifier. | ||
- If 2-legged access token is used, the presence of a device identifier in the response is mandatory and should be the same identifier type than the one provided in the request. | ||
|
||
Application of data minimization design must be considered by the API working group for event structure definition. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If we mandate above that in case of 2-legged access token response must include device identifier, how will the API working groups take decisions about data minimization?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We have discussed a bit this topic in Device Location sub projet.
If we use the 2-legs the device identifier must be mandatory but then in the subscription answer and in the notification itself we can avoid to send this identifier. I proposed some suggestion here: camaraproject/DeviceLocation#270 like adding a capability for the API consumer to indicate if the device & area information must be part of the event.
I think we probably cannot add more in commonalities for this release due to deadline but we can continue to explore the topic in API sub project. WDYT?
Co-authored-by: Shilpa Padgaonkar <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Shilpa Padgaonkar <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Shilpa Padgaonkar <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Shilpa Padgaonkar <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
What type of PR is this?
Add one of the following kinds:
What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR covers update to subscriptions & events part for Commonalities 0.5.0
Resolution: covered in this PR. Make a proposal in new part 11.7
Resolution: covered in this PR
Resolution: To be done - seems we have an alignement to make device optional. Direct impact with API misuse #259 - Need to be sync with @eric-murray - aligned with Eric PR Update error codes and info.description template for device / phone number identifiers #324
Resolution: covered in this PR. Added a sentence in the yaml and in the DG to clarify us of initialEvent vs subscriptionMaxEvents counting.
Follow the principle of data minimization for events based on explicit subscriptions #295- Adding a section on this topic in the DG document - Check for additional content with @shilpa-padgaonkar. Request with a larger scope thanResolution: Discussion still open in the issue
subscriptions
Resolution: Waiting for Support & Aligment of 504 Exception in CAMARA APIs #308 resolution - This one followed by @PedroDiez - Will apply on notification/subscriptions when 308 solved. 504 is not part of the event-subscriptions-template.yaml. From same discussion 415, 500 & 503 removed
Include Reference Link to CAMARA API Design Guidelines in Notification Cloud Events Artifact #290(@rartych - removed from this PR )Resolution: Very simple one but need to be done once we split the document. Probably to be removed from this PR as we'll merge this one before the splitting
Resolution: covered in this PR
Resolution: covered in this PR
Resolution: covered in this PR
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #243, #276, #289, #291, #300, #303, #304, #326
Special notes for reviewers:
Not ready for review
Changelog input
Additional documentation
This section can be blank.