Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added minor adjustments in the shadow status options #1359

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

agautam478
Copy link
Contributor

What changed?
Added minor adjustments in the shadow status options so that Terminated workflows are never replayed.
Removed the terminated workflow status from the All option as well.
Added default option for replaying only closed and open workflows and no other workflows if workflow status filter is not passed.

Why?
This is to ensure that the terminated workflows are not replayed. We also have bugs associated with continue as new workflows that need to be fixed before those wfs can be replayed.

How did you test it?
test cases.

Potential risks
shadower accuracy may get affected.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 25, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 76.48%. Comparing base (ed58224) to head (75c4f1e).

Additional details and impacted files
Files Coverage Δ
internal/query_builder.go 87.69% <ø> (ø)
internal/workflow_shadower.go 77.46% <100.00%> (ø)

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ed58224...75c4f1e. Read the comment docs.

@@ -183,7 +181,7 @@ func ToWorkflowStatus(statusString string) (WorkflowStatus, error) {
status := WorkflowStatus(strings.ToUpper(statusString))
switch status {
case WorkflowStatusOpen, WorkflowStatusClosed, WorkflowStatusCompleted,
WorkflowStatusFailed, WorkflowStatusCanceled, WorkflowStatusTerminated,
WorkflowStatusFailed, WorkflowStatusCanceled,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

you can still leave it here in the mapping function.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I will readd it later. removed it to be sure that the status can not be used in any situation at all.

@@ -338,10 +338,9 @@ func (o *ShadowOptions) validateAndPopulateFields() error {
}
statuses = append(statuses, status)
}
//All the open statuses are taken by default. This list seems to not work as expected.
//TODO: verify that the status list works as expected. currently all wfs of all types get picked up.
//This filter doesn't seem to be working as expected.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please elaborate in the comment what you mean

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This filter should have only taken open and closed wfs but it returns continue as new wfs as well. not sure if this is because of some other check somewhere or the query gets formed incorrectly.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please elaborate on this in the comment so it will be easier to identify the problem.
Consider adding a TODO: handle ContinueAsNew as a special case.

@@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ func (s *workflowShadowerSuite) TestShadowOptionsValidation() {
options: ShadowOptions{},
expectErr: false,
validationFn: func(options *ShadowOptions) {
s.Equal("(CloseTime = missing)", options.WorkflowQuery)
s.Equal("(CloseTime = missing or CloseTime != missing)", options.WorkflowQuery)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is not this equivalent to empty query?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it is but the query builder forms it this way because of open and closed statuses getting added together in the test. This portion of default status check needs a rewrite that I will be doing as a part of the shadower fix initiative.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we do have an ALL status filter somewhere but it barely gets used. Now the problem with that one is that it picks up everything present in that defaut list of statuses.

@@ -338,10 +338,9 @@ func (o *ShadowOptions) validateAndPopulateFields() error {
}
statuses = append(statuses, status)
}
//All the open statuses are taken by default. This list seems to not work as expected.
//TODO: verify that the status list works as expected. currently all wfs of all types get picked up.
//This filter doesn't seem to be working as expected.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please elaborate on this in the comment so it will be easier to identify the problem.
Consider adding a TODO: handle ContinueAsNew as a special case.

if len(statuses) == 0 {
statuses = []WorkflowStatus{WorkflowStatusOpen}
statuses = []WorkflowStatus{WorkflowStatusOpen, WorkflowStatusClosed}
}
queryBuilder.WorkflowStatus(statuses)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess modern DBs with good query analyzers will just drop this expression, but evaluation of this does not make any sense.
I suggest making this optional:

if len(statuses) != 0 {
  queryBuilder.WorkflowStatus(statuses)
}

Copy link
Contributor Author

@agautam478 agautam478 Jul 30, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

will incorporate this and update PR. Okay! so there's some other bug somewhere in there which created strange behavour in the filter so leaving the above as it is. I will be scrapping this piece anyway. I need this diff as an interim fix so that I ca continue working on the qb update without interrupting the customers.

@agautam478 agautam478 requested a review from 3vilhamster July 30, 2024 17:19
Copy link

@abhishekj720 abhishekj720 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.
For future me/others, during the shadower fix initiative, default status check would be rewritten.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants