Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Issue 797: Created a seperate markdown for before the waiver is available so link is not shown #810

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

sonikavuyyuru
Copy link
Contributor

Added in logic to check if the waiver is already available based on the waiver's availability date. Displays the appropriate text, only showing the waiver link if it is past the date that the waiver is available.

Copy link
Contributor

@srisainachuri srisainachuri left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some minor things to look at, but overall logic looks good! Let's also look into why the integration tests are failing before merging

@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
# Copyright (c) 2011-2022 Berkeley Model United Nations. All rights reserved.
# Use of this source code is governed by a BSD License (see LICENSE).
SESSION = 70
SESSION = 69
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's remove this from commit, since I assume locally you had to use 69. Our prod is on 70 right now

@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@
"less": "^4.1.0",
"less-loader": "^7.2.1",
"markdown-loader": "^6.0.0",
"mini-css-extract-plugin": "^1.3.3",
"mini-css-extract-plugin": "^1.6.2",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Was there a specific reason this version upgrade was needed? If it doesn't affect functionality and passes the unit tests, it should be fine though.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants