Role models are important.
-- Officer Alex J. Murphy / RoboCop
One thing has always bothered me as a Ruby developer - Python developers have a great programming style reference (PEP-8) and we never got an official guide, documenting Ruby coding style and best practices. And I do believe that style matters. I also believe that a great hacker community, such as Ruby has, should be quite capable of producing this coveted document.
This guide started its life as our internal company Ruby coding guidelines (written by yours truly). At some point I decided that the work I was doing might be interesting to members of the Ruby community in general and that the world had little need for another internal company guideline. But the world could certainly benefit from a community-driven and community-sanctioned set of practices, idioms and style prescriptions for Ruby programming.
Since the inception of the guide I've received a lot of feedback from members of the exceptional Ruby community around the world. Thanks for all the suggestions and the support! Together we can make a resource beneficial to each and every Ruby developer out there.
By the way, if you're into Rails you might want to check out the complementary Ruby on Rails Style Guide.
This Ruby style guide recommends best practices so that real-world Ruby programmers can write code that can be maintained by other real-world Ruby programmers. A style guide that reflects real-world usage gets used, and a style guide that holds to an ideal that has been rejected by the people it is supposed to help risks not getting used at all – no matter how good it is.
The guide is separated into several sections of related rules. I've tried to add the rationale behind the rules (if it's omitted I've assumed it's pretty obvious).
I didn't come up with all the rules out of nowhere - they are mostly based on my extensive career as a professional software engineer, feedback and suggestions from members of the Ruby community and various highly regarded Ruby programming resources, such as "Programming Ruby 1.9" and "The Ruby Programming Language".
There are some areas in which there is no clear consensus in the Ruby community regarding a particular style (like string literal quoting, spacing inside hash literals, dot position in multi-line method chaining, etc.). In such scenarios all popular styles are acknowledged and it's up to you to pick one and apply it consistently.
This style guide evolves over time as additional conventions are identified and past conventions are rendered obsolete by changes in Ruby itself.
Many projects have their own coding style guidelines (often derived from this guide). In the event of any conflicts, such project-specific guides take precedence for that project.
You can generate a PDF or an HTML copy of this guide using Transmuter.
RuboCop is a code analyzer, based on this style guide.
Translations of the guide are available in the following languages:
- Chinese Simplified
- Chinese Traditional
- French
- German
- Japanese
- Korean
- Portuguese
- Russian
- Spanish
- Vietnamese
- Source Code Layout
- Syntax
- Naming
- Comments
- Classes
- Exceptions
- Collections
- Strings
- Regular Expressions
- Percent Literals
- Metaprogramming
- Misc
- Tools
Nearly everybody is convinced that every style but their own is ugly and unreadable. Leave out the "but their own" and they're probably right...
-- Jerry Coffin (on indentation)
# bad - four spaces
def some_method
do_something
end
# good
def some_method
do_something
end
- Use Unix-style line endings. (*BSD/Solaris/Linux/OS X users are covered by default, Windows users have to be extra careful.)
-
If you're using Git you might want to add the following configuration setting to protect your project from Windows line endings creeping in:
$ git config --global core.autocrlf true
-
Don't use
;
to separate statements and expressions. As a corollary - use one expression per line.
# bad
puts 'foobar'; # superfluous semicolon
puts 'foo'; puts 'bar' # two expressions on the same line
# good
puts 'foobar'
puts 'foo'
puts 'bar'
puts 'foo', 'bar' # this applies to puts in particular
# bad
class FooError < StandardError
end
# okish
class FooError < StandardError; end
# good
FooError = Class.new(StandardError)
- Avoid single-line methods. Although they are somewhat popular in the wild, there are a few peculiarities about their definition syntax that make their use undesirable. At any rate - there should be no more than one expression in a single-line method.
# bad
def too_much; something; something_else; end
# okish - notice that the first ; is required
def no_braces_method; body end
# okish - notice that the second ; is optional
def no_braces_method; body; end
# okish - valid syntax, but no ; makes it kind of hard to read
def some_method() body end
# good
def some_method
body
end
One exception to the rule are empty-body methods.
# good
def no_op; end
-
Use spaces around operators, after commas, colons and semicolons, around
{
and before}
. Whitespace might be (mostly) irrelevant to the Ruby interpreter, but its proper use is the key to writing easily readable code.
sum = 1 + 2
a, b = 1, 2
[1, 2, 3].each { |e| puts e }
class FooError < StandardError; end
The only exception, regarding operators, is the exponent operator:
# bad
e = M * c ** 2
# good
e = M * c**2
{
and }
deserve a bit of clarification, since they are used
for block and hash literals, as well as string interpolation.
For hash literals two styles are considered acceptable.
# good - space after { and before }
{ one: 1, two: 2 }
# good - no space after { and before }
{one: 1, two: 2}
The first variant is slightly more readable (and arguably more popular in the Ruby community in general). The second variant has the advantage of adding visual difference between block and hash literals. Whichever one you pick - apply it consistently.
some(arg).other
[1, 2, 3].size
# bad
! something
# good
!something
# bad
1 .. 3
'a' ... 'z'
# good
1..3
'a'...'z'
-
Indent
when
as deep ascase
. I know that many would disagree with this one, but it's the style established in both "The Ruby Programming Language" and "Programming Ruby".
# bad
case
when song.name == 'Misty'
puts 'Not again!'
when song.duration > 120
puts 'Too long!'
when Time.now.hour > 21
puts "It's too late"
else
song.play
end
# good
case
when song.name == 'Misty'
puts 'Not again!'
when song.duration > 120
puts 'Too long!'
when Time.now.hour > 21
puts "It's too late"
else
song.play
end
- When assigning the result of a conditional expression to a variable, preserve the usual alignment of its branches.
# bad - pretty convoluted
kind = case year
when 1850..1889 then 'Blues'
when 1890..1909 then 'Ragtime'
when 1910..1929 then 'New Orleans Jazz'
when 1930..1939 then 'Swing'
when 1940..1950 then 'Bebop'
else 'Jazz'
end
result = if some_cond
calc_something
else
calc_something_else
end
# good - it's apparent what's going on
kind = case year
when 1850..1889 then 'Blues'
when 1890..1909 then 'Ragtime'
when 1910..1929 then 'New Orleans Jazz'
when 1930..1939 then 'Swing'
when 1940..1950 then 'Bebop'
else 'Jazz'
end
result = if some_cond
calc_something
else
calc_something_else
end
# good (and a bit more width efficient)
kind =
case year
when 1850..1889 then 'Blues'
when 1890..1909 then 'Ragtime'
when 1910..1929 then 'New Orleans Jazz'
when 1930..1939 then 'Swing'
when 1940..1950 then 'Bebop'
else 'Jazz'
end
result =
if some_cond
calc_something
else
calc_something_else
end
- Use empty lines between method definitions and also to break up a method into logical paragraphs internally.
def some_method
data = initialize(options)
data.manipulate!
data.result
end
def some_method
result
end
- Avoid comma after the last parameter in a method call, especially when the parameters are not on separate lines.
# bad - easier to move/add/remove parameters, but still not preferred
some_method(
size,
count,
color,
)
# bad
some_method(size, count, color, )
# good
some_method(size, count, color)
# bad
def some_method(arg1=:default, arg2=nil, arg3=[])
# do something...
end
# good
def some_method(arg1 = :default, arg2 = nil, arg3 = [])
# do something...
end
While several Ruby books suggest the first style, the second is much more prominent in practice (and arguably a bit more readable).
-
Avoid line continuation
\
where not required. In practice, avoid using line continuations for anything but string concatenation.
# bad
result = 1 - \
2
# good (but still ugly as hell)
result = 1 \
- 2
long_string = 'First part of the long string' \
' and second part of the long string'
-
Adopt a consistent multi-line method chaining style. There are two
popular styles in the Ruby community, both of which are considered
good - leading
.
(Option A) and trailing.
(Option B).
-
(Option A) When continuing a chained method invocation on another line keep the
.
on the second line.# bad - need to consult first line to understand second line one.two.three. four # good - it's immediately clear what's going on the second line one.two.three .four
-
(Option B) When continuing a chained method invocation on another line, include the
.
on the first line to indicate that the expression continues.# bad - need to read ahead to the second line to know that the chain continues one.two.three .four # good - it's immediately clear that the expression continues beyond the first line one.two.three. four
A discussion on the merits of both alternative styles can be found here.
- Align the parameters of a method call if they span more than one line. When aligning parameters is not appropriate due to line-length constraints, single indent for the lines after the first is also acceptable.
# starting point (line is too long)
def send_mail(source)
Mailer.deliver(to: '[email protected]', from: '[email protected]', subject: 'Important message', body: source.text)
end
# bad (double indent)
def send_mail(source)
Mailer.deliver(
to: '[email protected]',
from: '[email protected]',
subject: 'Important message',
body: source.text)
end
# good
def send_mail(source)
Mailer.deliver(to: '[email protected]',
from: '[email protected]',
subject: 'Important message',
body: source.text)
end
# good (normal indent)
def send_mail(source)
Mailer.deliver(
to: '[email protected]',
from: '[email protected]',
subject: 'Important message',
body: source.text
)
end
# bad - single indent
menu_item = ['Spam', 'Spam', 'Spam', 'Spam', 'Spam', 'Spam', 'Spam', 'Spam',
'Baked beans', 'Spam', 'Spam', 'Spam', 'Spam', 'Spam']
# good
menu_item = [
'Spam', 'Spam', 'Spam', 'Spam', 'Spam', 'Spam', 'Spam', 'Spam',
'Baked beans', 'Spam', 'Spam', 'Spam', 'Spam', 'Spam'
]
# good
menu_item =
['Spam', 'Spam', 'Spam', 'Spam', 'Spam', 'Spam', 'Spam', 'Spam',
'Baked beans', 'Spam', 'Spam', 'Spam', 'Spam', 'Spam']
# bad - how many 0s are there?
num = 1000000
# good - much easier to parse for the human brain
num = 1_000_000
-
Use RDoc and its conventions for API documentation. Don't put an
empty line between the comment block and the
def
.
- Don't use block comments. They cannot be preceded by whitespace and are not as easy to spot as regular comments.
# bad
=begin
comment line
another comment line
=end
# good
# comment line
# another comment line
-
Use
::
only to reference constants(this includes classes and modules) and constructors (likeArray()
orNokogiri::HTML()
). Do not use::
for regular method invocation.
# bad
SomeClass::some_method
some_object::some_method
# good
SomeClass.some_method
some_object.some_method
SomeModule::SomeClass::SOME_CONST
SomeModule::SomeClass()
-
Use
def
with parentheses when there are parameters. Omit the parentheses when the method doesn't accept any parameters.
# bad
def some_method()
# body omitted
end
# good
def some_method
# body omitted
end
# bad
def some_method_with_parameters param1, param2
# body omitted
end
# good
def some_method_with_parameters(param1, param2)
# body omitted
end
- Avoid the use of parallel assignment for defining variables. Parallel assignment is allowed when it is the return of a method call, used with the splat operator, or when used to swap variable assignment. Parallel assignment is less readable than separate assignment. It is also slightly slower than separate assignment.
# bad
a, b, c, d = 'foo', 'bar', 'baz', 'foobar'
# good
a = 'foo'
b = 'bar'
c = 'baz'
d = 'foobar'
# good - swapping variable assignment
# Swapping variable assignment is a special case because it will allow you to
# swap the values that are assigned to each variable.
a = 'foo'
b = 'bar'
a, b = b, a
puts a # => 'bar'
puts b # => 'foo'
# good - method return
def multi_return
[1, 2]
end
first, second = multi_return
# good - use with splat
first, *list = [1,2,3,4]
hello_array = *"Hello"
a = *(1..3)
-
Do not use
for
, unless you know exactly why. Most of the time iterators should be used instead.for
is implemented in terms ofeach
(so you're adding a level of indirection), but with a twist -for
doesn't introduce a new scope (unlikeeach
) and variables defined in its block will be visible outside it.
arr = [1, 2, 3]
# bad
for elem in arr do
puts elem
end
# note that elem is accessible outside of the for loop
elem # => 3
# good
arr.each { |elem| puts elem }
# elem is not accessible outside each's block
elem # => NameError: undefined local variable or method `elem'
# bad
if some_condition then
# body omitted
end
# good
if some_condition
# body omitted
end
# bad
if
some_condition
do_something
do_something_else
end
# good
if some_condition
do_something
do_something_else
end
-
Favor the ternary operator(
?:
) overif/then/else/end
constructs. It's more common and obviously more concise.
# bad
result = if some_condition then something else something_else end
# good
result = some_condition ? something : something_else
-
Use one expression per branch in a ternary operator. This
also means that ternary operators must not be nested. Prefer
if/else
constructs in these cases.
# bad
some_condition ? (nested_condition ? nested_something : nested_something_else) : something_else
# good
if some_condition
nested_condition ? nested_something : nested_something_else
else
something_else
end
# bad
result = if some_condition; something else something_else end
# good
result = some_condition ? something : something_else
# bad
if condition
result = x
else
result = y
end
# good
result =
if condition
x
else
y
end
-
Use
when x then ...
for one-line cases. The alternative syntaxwhen x: ...
has been removed as of Ruby 1.9.
# bad - braces are required because of op precedence
x = (not something)
# good
x = !something
# bad
x = 'test'
# obscure nil check
if !!x
# body omitted
end
x = false
# double negation is useless on booleans
!!x # => false
# good
x = 'test'
unless x.nil?
# body omitted
end
# bad
# boolean expression
if some_condition and some_other_condition
do_something
end
# control flow
document.saved? or document.save!
# good
# boolean expression
if some_condition && some_other_condition
do_something
end
# control flow
document.saved? || document.save!
-
Favor modifier
if/unless
usage when you have a single-line body. Another good alternative is the usage of control flow&&/||
.
# bad
if some_condition
do_something
end
# good
do_something if some_condition
# another good option
some_condition && do_something
# bad
10.times do
# multi-line body omitted
end if some_condition
# good
if some_condition
10.times do
# multi-line body omitted
end
end
# bad
do_something if !some_condition
# bad
do_something if not some_condition
# good
do_something unless some_condition
# another good option
some_condition || do_something
# bad
unless success?
puts 'failure'
else
puts 'success'
end
# good
if success?
puts 'success'
else
puts 'failure'
end
# bad
if (x > 10)
# body omitted
end
# good
if x > 10
# body omitted
end
Note that there is an exception to this rule, namely safe assignment in condition.
# bad
while x > 5 do
# body omitted
end
until x > 5 do
# body omitted
end
# good
while x > 5
# body omitted
end
until x > 5
# body omitted
end
# bad
while some_condition
do_something
end
# good
do_something while some_condition
# bad
do_something while !some_condition
# good
do_something until some_condition
# bad
while true
do_something
end
until false
do_something
end
# good
loop do
do_something
end
# bad
begin
puts val
val += 1
end while val < 0
# good
loop do
puts val
val += 1
break unless val < 0
end
-
Omit parentheses around parameters for methods that are part of an internal
DSL (e.g. Rake, Rails, RSpec), methods that have "keyword" status in Ruby
(e.g.
attr_reader
,puts
) and attribute access methods. Use parentheses around the arguments of all other method invocations.
class Person
attr_reader :name, :age
# omitted
end
temperance = Person.new('Temperance', 30)
temperance.name
puts temperance.age
x = Math.sin(y)
array.delete(e)
bowling.score.should == 0
# bad
user.set({ name: 'John', age: 45, permissions: { read: true } })
# good
user.set(name: 'John', age: 45, permissions: { read: true })
class Person < ActiveRecord::Base
# bad
validates(:name, { presence: true, length: { within: 1..10 } })
# good
validates :name, presence: true, length: { within: 1..10 }
end
# bad
Kernel.exit!()
2.even?()
fork()
'test'.upcase()
# good
Kernel.exit!
2.even?
fork
'test'.upcase
# bad
names.map { |name| name.upcase }
# good
names.map(&:upcase)
-
Prefer
{...}
overdo...end
for single-line blocks. Avoid using{...}
for multi-line blocks (multiline chaining is always ugly). Always usedo...end
for "control flow" and "method definitions" (e.g. in Rakefiles and certain DSLs). Avoiddo...end
when chaining.
names = %w(Bozhidar Steve Sarah)
# bad
names.each do |name|
puts name
end
# good
names.each { |name| puts name }
# bad
names.select do |name|
name.start_with?('S')
end.map { |name| name.upcase }
# good
names.select { |name| name.start_with?('S') }.map(&:upcase)
Some will argue that multiline chaining would look OK with the use of {...}, but they should ask themselves - is this code really readable and can the blocks' contents be extracted into nifty methods?
- Consider using explicit block argument to avoid writing block literal that just passes its arguments to another block. Beware of the performance impact, though, as the block gets converted to a Proc.
require 'tempfile'
# bad
def with_tmp_dir
Dir.mktmpdir do |tmp_dir|
Dir.chdir(tmp_dir) { |dir| yield dir } # block just passes arguments
end
end
# good
def with_tmp_dir(&block)
Dir.mktmpdir do |tmp_dir|
Dir.chdir(tmp_dir, &block)
end
end
with_tmp_dir do |dir|
puts "dir is accessible as a parameter and pwd is set: #{dir}"
end
# bad
def some_method(some_arr)
return some_arr.size
end
# good
def some_method(some_arr)
some_arr.size
end
# bad
def ready?
if self.last_reviewed_at > self.last_updated_at
self.worker.update(self.content, self.options)
self.status = :in_progress
end
self.status == :verified
end
# good
def ready?
if last_reviewed_at > last_updated_at
worker.update(content, options)
self.status = :in_progress
end
status == :verified
end
class Foo
attr_accessor :options
# ok
def initialize(options)
self.options = options
# both options and self.options are equivalent here
end
# bad
def do_something(options = {})
unless options[:when] == :later
output(self.options[:message])
end
end
# good
def do_something(params = {})
unless params[:when] == :later
output(options[:message])
end
end
end
-
Don't use the return value of
=
(an assignment) in conditional expressions unless the assignment is wrapped in parentheses. This is a fairly popular idiom among Rubyists that's sometimes referred to as safe assignment in condition.
# bad (+ a warning)
if v = array.grep(/foo/)
do_something(v)
...
end
# good (MRI would still complain, but RuboCop won't)
if (v = array.grep(/foo/))
do_something(v)
...
end
# good
v = array.grep(/foo/)
if v
do_something(v)
...
end
# bad
x = x + y
x = x * y
x = x**y
x = x / y
x = x || y
x = x && y
# good
x += y
x *= y
x **= y
x /= y
x ||= y
x &&= y
# bad
name = name ? name : 'Bozhidar'
# bad
name = 'Bozhidar' unless name
# good - set name to Bozhidar, only if it's nil or false
name ||= 'Bozhidar'
-
Don't use
||=
to initialize boolean variables. (Consider what would happen if the current value happened to befalse
.)
# bad - would set enabled to true even if it was false
enabled ||= true
# good
enabled = true if enabled.nil?
-
Use
&&=
to preprocess variables that may or may not exist. Using&&=
will change the value only if it exists, removing the need to check its existence withif
.
# bad
if something
something = something.downcase
end
# bad
something = something ? something.downcase : nil
# ok
something = something.downcase if something
# good
something = something && something.downcase
# better
something &&= something.downcase
-
Avoid explicit use of the case equality operator
===
. As its name implies it is meant to be used implicitly bycase
expressions and outside of them it yields some pretty confusing code.
# bad
Array === something
(1..100) === 7
/something/ === some_string
# good
something.is_a?(Array)
(1..100).include?(7)
some_string =~ /something/
-
Do not use
eql?
when using==
will do. The stricter comparison semantics provided byeql?
are rarely needed in practice.
# bad - eql? is the same as == for strings
"ruby".eql? some_str
# good
"ruby" == some_str
1.0.eql? x # eql? makes sense here if want to differentiate between Fixnum and Float 1
-
Avoid using Perl-style special variables (like
$:
,$;
, etc. ). They are quite cryptic and their use in anything but one-liner scripts is discouraged. Use the human-friendly aliases provided by theEnglish
library.
# bad
$:.unshift File.dirname(__FILE__)
# good
require 'English'
$LOAD_PATH.unshift File.dirname(__FILE__)
# bad
f (3 + 2) + 1
# good
f(3 + 2) + 1
-
If the first argument to a method begins with an open parenthesis, always
use parentheses in the method invocation. For example, write
f((3 + 2) + 1)
.
-
Always run the Ruby interpreter with the
-w
option so it will warn you if you forget either of the rules above!
- Do not use nested method definitions, use lambda instead. Nested method definitions actually produce methods in the same scope (e.g. class) as the outer method. Furthermore, the "nested method" will be redefined every time the method containing its definition is invoked.
# bad
def foo(x)
def bar(y)
# body omitted
end
bar(x)
end
# good - the same as the previous, but no bar redefinition on every foo call
def bar(y)
# body omitted
end
def foo(x)
bar(x)
end
# also good
def foo(x)
bar = ->(y) { ... }
bar.call(x)
end
-
Use the new lambda literal syntax for single line body blocks. Use the
lambda
method for multi-line blocks.
# bad
l = lambda { |a, b| a + b }
l.call(1, 2)
# correct, but looks extremely awkward
l = ->(a, b) do
tmp = a * 7
tmp * b / 50
end
# good
l = ->(a, b) { a + b }
l.call(1, 2)
l = lambda do |a, b|
tmp = a * 7
tmp * b / 50
end
# bad
l = ->x, y { something(x, y) }
# good
l = ->(x, y) { something(x, y) }
# bad
l = ->() { something }
# good
l = -> { something }
# bad
p = Proc.new { |n| puts n }
# good
p = proc { |n| puts n }
# bad - looks similar to Enumeration access
l = ->(v) { puts v }
l[1]
# also bad - uncommon syntax
l = ->(v) { puts v }
l.(1)
# good
l = ->(v) { puts v }
l.call(1)
-
Prefix with
_
unused block parameters and local variables. It's also acceptable to use just_
(although it's a bit less descriptive). This convention is recognized by the Ruby interpreter and tools like RuboCop and will suppress their unused variable warnings.
# bad
result = hash.map { |k, v| v + 1 }
def something(x)
unused_var, used_var = something_else(x)
# ...
end
# good
result = hash.map { |_k, v| v + 1 }
def something(x)
_unused_var, used_var = something_else(x)
# ...
end
# good
result = hash.map { |_, v| v + 1 }
def something(x)
_, used_var = something_else(x)
# ...
end
-
Use
$stdout/$stderr/$stdin
instead ofSTDOUT/STDERR/STDIN
.STDOUT/STDERR/STDIN
are constants, and while you can actually reassign (possibly to redirect some stream) constants in Ruby, you'll get an interpreter warning if you do so.
-
Use
warn
instead of$stderr.puts
. Apart from being more concise and clear,warn
allows you to suppress warnings if you need to (by setting the warn level to 0 via-W0
).
# bad
'%d %d' % [20, 10]
# => '20 10'
# good
sprintf('%d %d', 20, 10)
# => '20 10'
# good
sprintf('%{first} %{second}', first: 20, second: 10)
# => '20 10'
format('%d %d', 20, 10)
# => '20 10'
# good
format('%{first} %{second}', first: 20, second: 10)
# => '20 10'
a string argument.
# bad
%w(one two three) * ', '
# => 'one, two, three'
# good
%w(one two three).join(', ')
# => 'one, two, three'
-
Use
[*var]
orArray()
instead of explicitArray
check, when dealing with a variable you want to treat as an Array, but you're not certain it's an array.
# bad
paths = [paths] unless paths.is_a? Array
paths.each { |path| do_something(path) }
# good
[*paths].each { |path| do_something(path) }
# good (and a bit more readable)
Array(paths).each { |path| do_something(path) }
# bad
do_something if x >= 1000 && x <= 2000
# good
do_something if (1000..2000).include?(x)
# good
do_something if x.between?(1000, 2000)
# bad
if x % 2 == 0
end
if x % 2 == 1
end
if x == nil
end
# good
if x.even?
end
if x.odd?
end
if x.nil?
end
if x.zero?
end
if x == 0
end
# bad
do_something if !something.nil?
do_something if something != nil
# good
do_something if something
# good - dealing with a boolean
def value_set?
!@some_boolean.nil?
end
# bad
END { puts 'Goodbye!' }
# good
at_exit { puts 'Goodbye!' }
Prefer a guard clause when you can assert invalid data. A guard clause is a conditional statement at the top of a function that bails out as soon as it can.
# bad
def compute_thing(thing)
if thing[:foo]
update_with_bar(thing)
if thing[:foo][:bar]
partial_compute(thing)
else
re_compute(thing)
end
end
end
# good
def compute_thing(thing)
return unless thing[:foo]
update_with_bar(thing[:foo])
return re_compute(thing) unless thing[:foo][:bar]
partial_compute(thing)
end
Prefer next
in loops instead of conditional blocks.
# bad
[0, 1, 2, 3].each do |item|
if item > 1
puts item
end
end
# good
[0, 1, 2, 3].each do |item|
next unless item > 1
puts item
end
-
Prefer
map
overcollect
,find
overdetect
,select
overfind_all
,reduce
overinject
andsize
overlength
. This is not a hard requirement; if the use of the alias enhances readability, it's ok to use it. The rhyming methods are inherited from Smalltalk and are not common in other programming languages. The reason the use ofselect
is encouraged overfind_all
is that it goes together nicely withreject
and its name is pretty self-explanatory.
-
Don't use
count
as a substitute forsize
. ForEnumerable
objects other thanArray
it will iterate the entire collection in order to determine its size.
# bad
some_hash.count
# good
some_hash.size
-
Use
flat_map
instead ofmap
+flatten
. This does not apply for arrays with a depth greater than 2, i.e. ifusers.first.songs == ['a', ['b','c']]
, then usemap + flatten
rather thanflat_map
.flat_map
flattens the array by 1, whereasflatten
flattens it all the way.
# bad
all_songs = users.map(&:songs).flatten.uniq
# good
all_songs = users.flat_map(&:songs).uniq
-
Prefer
reverse_each
toreverse.each
because some classes thatinclude Enumerable
will provide an efficient implementation. Even in the worst case where a class does not provide a specialized implementation, the general implementation inherited fromEnumerable
will be at least as efficient as usingreverse.each
.
# bad
array.reverse.each { ... }
# good
array.reverse_each { ... }
The only real difficulties in programming are cache invalidation and naming things.
-- Phil Karlton
# bad - identifier using non-ascii characters
заплата = 1_000
# bad - identifier is a Bulgarian word, written with Latin letters (instead of Cyrillic)
zaplata = 1_000
# good
salary = 1_000
# bad
:'some symbol'
:SomeSymbol
:someSymbol
someVar = 5
def someMethod
...
end
def SomeMethod
...
end
# good
:some_symbol
def some_method
...
end
# bad
class Someclass
...
end
class Some_Class
...
end
class SomeXml
...
end
class XmlSomething
...
end
# good
class SomeClass
...
end
class SomeXML
...
end
class XMLSomething
...
end
- Aim to have just a single class/module per source file. Name the file name as the class/module, but replacing CamelCase with snake_case.
# bad
SomeConst = 5
# good
SOME_CONST = 5
-
The names of predicate methods (methods that return a boolean value) should
end in a question mark. (i.e.
Array#empty?
). Methods that don't return a boolean, shouldn't end in a question mark.
-
The names of potentially dangerous methods (i.e. methods that modify
self
or the arguments,exit!
(doesn't run the finalizers likeexit
does), etc.) should end with an exclamation mark if there exists a safe version of that dangerous method.
# bad - there is no matching 'safe' method
class Person
def update!
end
end
# good
class Person
def update
end
end
# good
class Person
def update!
end
def update
end
end
class Array
def flatten_once!
res = []
each do |e|
[*e].each { |f| res << f }
end
replace(res)
end
def flatten_once
dup.flatten_once!
end
end
-
When defining binary operators, name the parameter
other
(<<
and[]
are exceptions to the rule, since their semantics are different).
def +(other)
# body omitted
end
Good code is its own best documentation. As you're about to add a comment, ask yourself, "How can I improve the code so that this comment isn't needed?" Improve the code and then document it to make it even clearer.
-- Steve McConnell
- Comments longer than a word are capitalized and use punctuation. Use one space after periods.
# bad
counter += 1 # Increments counter by one.
Good code is like a good joke - it needs no explanation.
-- Russ Olsen
- Avoid writing comments to explain bad code. Refactor the code to make it self-explanatory. (Do or do not - there is no try. --Yoda)
-
If multiple lines are required to describe the problem, subsequent lines
should be indented three spaces after the
#
(one general plus two for indentation purpose).
def bar
# FIXME: This has crashed occasionally since v3.2.1. It may
# be related to the BarBazUtil upgrade.
baz(:quux)
end
- In cases where the problem is so obvious that any documentation would be redundant, annotations may be left at the end of the offending line with no note. This usage should be the exception and not the rule.
def bar
sleep 100 # OPTIMIZE
end
-
Use
HACK
to note code smells where questionable coding practices were used and should be refactored away.
-
Use
REVIEW
to note anything that should be looked at to confirm it is working as intended. For example:REVIEW: Are we sure this is how the client does X currently?
-
Use other custom annotation keywords if it feels appropriate, but be sure to
document them in your project's
README
or similar.
class Person
# extend and include go first
extend SomeModule
include AnotherModule
# inner classes
CustomErrorKlass = Class.new(StandardError)
# constants are next
SOME_CONSTANT = 20
# afterwards we have attribute macros
attr_reader :name
# followed by other macros (if any)
validates :name
# public class methods are next in line
def self.some_method
end
# initialization goes between class methods and other instance methods
def initialize
end
# followed by other public instance methods
def some_method
end
# protected and private methods are grouped near the end
protected
def some_protected_method
end
private
def some_private_method
end
end
- Don't nest multi line classes within classes. Try to have such nested classes each in their own file in a folder named like the containing class.
# bad
# foo.rb
class Foo
class Bar
# 30 methods inside
end
class Car
# 20 methods inside
end
# 30 methods inside
end
# good
# foo.rb
class Foo
# 30 methods inside
end
# foo/bar.rb
class Foo
class Bar
# 30 methods inside
end
end
# foo/car.rb
class Foo
class Car
# 20 methods inside
end
end
- Prefer modules to classes with only class methods. Classes should be used only when it makes sense to create instances out of them.
# bad
class SomeClass
def self.some_method
# body omitted
end
def self.some_other_method
end
end
# good
module SomeModule
module_function
def some_method
# body omitted
end
def some_other_method
end
end
-
Favor the use of
module_function
overextend self
when you want to turn a module's instance methods into class methods.
# bad
module Utilities
extend self
def parse_something(string)
# do stuff here
end
def other_utility_method(number, string)
# do some more stuff
end
end
# good
module Utilities
module_function
def parse_something(string)
# do stuff here
end
def other_utility_method(number, string)
# do some more stuff
end
end
- When designing class hierarchies make sure that they conform to the Liskov Substitution Principle.
- Try to make your classes as SOLID as possible.
class Person
attr_reader :first_name, :last_name
def initialize(first_name, last_name)
@first_name = first_name
@last_name = last_name
end
def to_s
"#{@first_name} #{@last_name}"
end
end
# bad
class Person
def initialize(first_name, last_name)
@first_name = first_name
@last_name = last_name
end
def first_name
@first_name
end
def last_name
@last_name
end
end
# good
class Person
attr_reader :first_name, :last_name
def initialize(first_name, last_name)
@first_name = first_name
@last_name = last_name
end
end
# bad - creates a single attribute accessor (deprecated in 1.9)
attr :something, true
attr :one, :two, :three # behaves as attr_reader
# good
attr_accessor :something
attr_reader :one, :two, :three
-
Consider using
Struct.new
, which defines the trivial accessors, constructor and comparison operators for you.
# good
class Person
attr_accessor :first_name, :last_name
def initialize(first_name, last_name)
@first_name = first_name
@last_name = last_name
end
end
# better
Person = Struct.new(:first_name, :last_name) do
end
-
Don't extend an instance initialized by
Struct.new
. Extending it introduces a superfluous class level and may also introduce weird errors if the file is required multiple times.
# bad
class Person < Struct.new(:first_name, :last_name)
end
# good
Person = Struct.new(:first_name, :last_name)
- Consider adding factory methods to provide additional sensible ways to create instances of a particular class.
class Person
def self.create(options_hash)
# body omitted
end
end
- Prefer duck-typing over inheritance.
# bad
class Animal
# abstract method
def speak
end
end
# extend superclass
class Duck < Animal
def speak
puts 'Quack! Quack'
end
end
# extend superclass
class Dog < Animal
def speak
puts 'Bau! Bau!'
end
end
# good
class Duck
def speak
puts 'Quack! Quack'
end
end
class Dog
def speak
puts 'Bau! Bau!'
end
end
class Parent
@@class_var = 'parent'
def self.print_class_var
puts @@class_var
end
end
class Child < Parent
@@class_var = 'child'
end
Parent.print_class_var # => will print "child"
As you can see all the classes in a class hierarchy actually share one class variable. Class instance variables should usually be preferred over class variables.
-
Assign proper visibility levels to methods (
private
,protected
) in accordance with their intended usage. Don't go off leaving everythingpublic
(which is the default). After all we're coding in Ruby now, not in Python.
-
Indent the
public
,protected
, andprivate
methods as much as the method definitions they apply to. Leave one blank line above the visibility modifier and one blank line below in order to emphasize that it applies to all methods below it.
class SomeClass
def public_method
# ...
end
private
def private_method
# ...
end
def another_private_method
# ...
end
end
-
Use
def self.method
to define class methods. This makes the code easier to refactor since the class name is not repeated.
class TestClass
# bad
def TestClass.some_method
# body omitted
end
# good
def self.some_other_method
# body omitted
end
# Also possible and convenient when you
# have to define many class methods.
class << self
def first_method
# body omitted
end
def second_method_etc
# body omitted
end
end
end
-
Prefer
alias
when aliasing methods in lexical class scope as the resolution ofself
in this context is also lexical, and it communicates clearly to the user that the indirection of your alias will not be altered at runtime or by any subclass unless made explicit.
class Westerner
def first_name
@names.first
end
alias given_name first_name
end
Since alias
, like def
, is a keyword, prefer bareword arguments over
symbols or strings. In other words, do alias foo bar
, not
alias :foo :bar
.
Also be aware of how Ruby handles aliases and inheritance: an alias references the method that was resolved at the time the alias was defined; it is not dispatched dynamically.
class Fugitive < Westerner
def first_name
'Nobody'
end
end
In this example, Fugitive#given_name
would still call the original
Westerner#first_name
method, not Fugitive#first_name
. To override the
behavior of Fugitive#given_name
as well, you'd have to redefine it in the
derived class.
class Fugitive < Westerner
def first_name
'Nobody'
end
alias given_name first_name
end
-
Always use
alias_method
when aliasing methods of modules, classes, or singleton classes at runtime, as the lexical scope ofalias
leads to unpredictability in these cases.
module Mononymous
def self.included(other)
other.class_eval { alias_method :full_name, :given_name }
end
end
class Sting < Westerner
include Mononymous
end
-
Signal exceptions using the
fail
method. Useraise
only when catching an exception and re-raising it (because here you're not failing, but explicitly and purposefully raising an exception).
begin
fail 'Oops'
rescue => error
raise if error.message != 'Oops'
end
# bad
fail RuntimeError, 'message'
# good - signals a RuntimeError by default
fail 'message'
-
Prefer supplying an exception class and a message as two separate arguments
to
fail/raise
, instead of an exception instance.
# bad
fail SomeException.new('message')
# Note that there is no way to do `fail SomeException.new('message'), backtrace`.
# good
fail SomeException, 'message'
# Consistent with `fail SomeException, 'message', backtrace`.
-
Do not return from an
ensure
block. If you explicitly return from a method inside anensure
block, the return will take precedence over any exception being raised, and the method will return as if no exception had been raised at all. In effect, the exception will be silently thrown away.
def foo
fail
ensure
return 'very bad idea'
end
# bad
def foo
begin
# main logic goes here
rescue
# failure handling goes here
end
end
# good
def foo
# main logic goes here
rescue
# failure handling goes here
end
-
Mitigate the proliferation of
begin
blocks by using contingency methods (a term coined by Avdi Grimm).
# bad
begin
something_that_might_fail
rescue IOError
# handle IOError
end
begin
something_else_that_might_fail
rescue IOError
# handle IOError
end
# good
def with_io_error_handling
yield
rescue IOError
# handle IOError
end
with_io_error_handling { something_that_might_fail }
with_io_error_handling { something_else_that_might_fail }
# bad
begin
# an exception occurs here
rescue SomeError
# the rescue clause does absolutely nothing
end
# bad
do_something rescue nil
# bad - this catches exceptions of StandardError class and its descendant classes
read_file rescue handle_error($!)
# good - this catches only the exceptions of Errno::ENOENT class and its descendant classes
def foo
read_file
rescue Errno::ENOENT => ex
handle_error(ex)
end
# bad
begin
n / d
rescue ZeroDivisionError
puts 'Cannot divide by 0!'
end
# good
if d.zero?
puts 'Cannot divide by 0!'
else
n / d
end
-
Avoid rescuing the
Exception
class. This will trap signals and calls toexit
, requiring you tokill -9
the process.
# bad
begin
# calls to exit and kill signals will be caught (except kill -9)
exit
rescue Exception
puts "you didn't really want to exit, right?"
# exception handling
end
# good
begin
# a blind rescue rescues from StandardError, not Exception as many
# programmers assume.
rescue => e
# exception handling
end
# also good
begin
# an exception occurs here
rescue StandardError => e
# exception handling
end
# bad
begin
# some code
rescue Exception => e
# some handling
rescue StandardError => e
# some handling that will never be executed
end
# good
begin
# some code
rescue StandardError => e
# some handling
rescue Exception => e
# some handling
end
f = File.open('testfile')
begin
# .. process
rescue
# .. handle error
ensure
f.close if f
end
# bad - you need to close the file descriptor explicitly
f = File.open('testfile')
# ...
f.close
# good - the file descriptor is closed automatically
File.open('testfile') do |f|
# ...
end
- Prefer literal array and hash creation notation (unless you need to pass parameters to their constructors, that is).
# bad
arr = Array.new
hash = Hash.new
# good
arr = []
hash = {}
-
Prefer
%w
to the literal array syntax when you need an array of words (non-empty strings without spaces and special characters in them). Apply this rule only to arrays with two or more elements.
# bad
STATES = ['draft', 'open', 'closed']
# good
STATES = %w(draft open closed)
-
Prefer
%i
to the literal array syntax when you need an array of symbols (and you don't need to maintain Ruby 1.9 compatibility). Apply this rule only to arrays with two or more elements.
# bad
STATES = [:draft, :open, :closed]
# good
STATES = %i(draft open closed)
-
Avoid comma after the last item of an
Array
orHash
literal, especially when the items are not on separate lines.
# bad - easier to move/add/remove items, but still not preferred
VALUES = [
1001,
2020,
3333,
]
# bad
VALUES = [1001, 2020, 3333, ]
# good
VALUES = [1001, 2020, 3333]
arr = []
arr[100] = 1 # now you have an array with lots of nils
-
Use
Set
instead ofArray
when dealing with unique elements.Set
implements a collection of unordered values with no duplicates. This is a hybrid ofArray
's intuitive inter-operation facilities andHash
's fast lookup.
# bad
hash = { 'one' => 1, 'two' => 2, 'three' => 3 }
# good
hash = { one: 1, two: 2, three: 3 }
# bad
hash = { :one => 1, :two => 2, :three => 3 }
# good
hash = { one: 1, two: 2, three: 3 }
- Don't mix the Ruby 1.9 hash syntax with hash rockets in the same hash literal. When you've got keys that are not symbols stick to the hash rockets syntax.
# bad
{ a: 1, 'b' => 2 }
# good
{ :a => 1, 'b' => 2 }
-
Use
Hash#key?
instead ofHash#has_key?
andHash#value?
instead ofHash#has_value?
. As noted here by Matz, the longer forms are considered deprecated.
# bad
hash.has_key?(:test)
hash.has_value?(value)
# good
hash.key?(:test)
hash.value?(value)
heroes = { batman: 'Bruce Wayne', superman: 'Clark Kent' }
# bad - if we make a mistake we might not spot it right away
heroes[:batman] # => "Bruce Wayne"
heroes[:supermann] # => nil
# good - fetch raises a KeyError making the problem obvious
heroes.fetch(:supermann)
batman = { name: 'Bruce Wayne', is_evil: false }
# bad - if we just use || operator with falsy value we won't get the expected result
batman[:is_evil] || true # => true
# good - fetch work correctly with falsy values
batman.fetch(:is_evil, true) # => false
-
Prefer the use of the block instead of the default value in
Hash#fetch
if the code that has to be evaluated may have side effects or be expensive.batman = { name: 'Bruce Wayne' } # bad - if we use the default value, we eager evaluate it # so it can slow the program down if done multiple times batman.fetch(:powers, obtain_batman_powers) # obtain_batman_powers is an expensive call # good - blocks are lazy evaluated, so only triggered in case of KeyError exception batman.fetch(:powers) { obtain_batman_powers }
-
Use
Hash#values_at
when you need to retrieve several values consecutively from a hash.
# bad
email = data['email']
username = data['nickname']
# good
email, username = data.values_at('email', 'nickname')
-
When accessing elements of a collection, avoid direct access
via
[n]
by using an alternate form of the reader method if it is supplied. This guards you from calling[]
onnil
.
# bad
Regexp.last_match[1]
# good
Regexp.last_match(1)
-
When providing an accessor for a collection, provide an alternate form
to save users from checking for
nil
before accessing an element in the collection.
# bad
def awesome_things
@awesome_things
end
# good
def awesome_things(index = nil)
if index && @awesome_things
@awesome_things[index]
else
@awesome_things
end
end
# bad
email_with_name = user.name + ' <' + user.email + '>'
# good
email_with_name = "#{user.name} <#{user.email}>"
# good
email_with_name = format('%s <%s>', user.name, user.email)
# bad
"From: #{ user.first_name }, #{ user.last_name }"
# good
"From: #{user.first_name}, #{user.last_name}"
- Adopt a consistent string literal quoting style. There are two popular styles in the Ruby community, both of which are considered good - single quotes by default (Option A) and double quotes by default (Option B).
-
(Option A) Prefer single-quoted strings when you don't need string interpolation or special symbols such as
\t
,\n
,'
, etc.# bad name = "Bozhidar" # good name = 'Bozhidar'
-
(Option B) Prefer double-quotes unless your string literal contains
"
or escape characters you want to suppress.# bad name = 'Bozhidar' # good name = "Bozhidar"
The string literals in this guide are aligned with the first style.
-
Don't use the character literal syntax
?x
. Since Ruby 1.9 it's basically redundant -?x
would interpreted as'x'
(a string with a single character in it).
# bad
char = ?c
# good
char = 'c'
class Person
attr_reader :first_name, :last_name
def initialize(first_name, last_name)
@first_name = first_name
@last_name = last_name
end
# bad - valid, but awkward
def to_s
"#@first_name #@last_name"
end
# good
def to_s
"#{@first_name} #{@last_name}"
end
end
$global = 0
# bad
puts "$global = #$global"
# good
puts "$global = #{$global}"
# bad
message = "This is the #{result.to_s}."
# good
message = "This is the #{result}."
-
Avoid using
String#+
when you need to construct large data chunks. Instead, useString#<<
. Concatenation mutates the string instance in-place and is always faster thanString#+
, which creates a bunch of new string objects.
# good and also fast
html = ''
html << '<h1>Page title</h1>'
paragraphs.each do |paragraph|
html << "<p>#{paragraph}</p>"
end
url = 'http://example.com'
str = 'lisp-case-rules'
# bad
url.gsub("http://", "https://")
str.gsub("-", "_")
# good
url.sub("http://", "https://")
str.tr("-", "_")
- When using heredocs for multi-line strings keep in mind the fact that they preserve leading whitespace. It's a good practice to employ some margin based on which to trim the excessive whitespace.
code = <<-END.gsub(/^\s+\|/, '')
|def test
| some_method
| other_method
|end
END
# => "def test\n some_method\n other_method\nend\n"
Some people, when confronted with a problem, think "I know, I'll use regular expressions." Now they have two problems.
-- Jamie Zawinski
match = string[/regexp/] # get content of matched regexp
first_group = string[/text(grp)/, 1] # get content of captured group
string[/text (grp)/, 1] = 'replace' # string => 'text replace'
/(first|second)/ # bad
/(?:first|second)/ # good
-
Don't use the cryptic Perl-legacy variables denoting last regexp group
matches (
$1
,$2
, etc). UseRegexp.last_match(n)
instead.
/(regexp)/ =~ string
...
# bad
process $1
# good
process Regexp.last_match(1)
- Avoid using numbered groups as it can be hard to track what they contain. Named groups can be used instead.
# bad
/(regexp)/ =~ string
...
process Regexp.last_match(1)
# good
/(?<meaningful_var>regexp)/ =~ string
...
process meaningful_var
-
Character classes have only a few special characters you should care about:
^
,-
,\
,]
, so don't escape.
or brackets in[]
.
-
Be careful with
^
and$
as they match start/end of line, not string endings. If you want to match the whole string use:\A
and\z
(not to be confused with\Z
which is the equivalent of/\n?\z/
).
string = "some injection\nusername"
string[/^username$/] # matches
string[/\Ausername\z/] # doesn't match
-
Use
x
modifier for complex regexps. This makes them more readable and you can add some useful comments. Just be careful as spaces are ignored.
regexp = /
start # some text
\s # white space char
(group) # first group
(?:alt1|alt2) # some alternation
end
/x
-
Use
%()
(it's a shorthand for%Q
) for single-line strings which require both interpolation and embedded double-quotes. For multi-line strings, prefer heredocs.
# bad (no interpolation needed)
%(<div class="text">Some text</div>)
# should be '<div class="text">Some text</div>'
# bad (no double-quotes)
%(This is #{quality} style)
# should be "This is #{quality} style"
# bad (multiple lines)
%(<div>\n<span class="big">#{exclamation}</span>\n</div>)
# should be a heredoc.
# good (requires interpolation, has quotes, single line)
%(<tr><td class="name">#{name}</td>)
-
Avoid
%q
unless you have a string with both'
and"
in it. Regular string literals are more readable and should be preferred unless a lot of characters would have to be escaped in them.
# bad
name = %q(Bruce Wayne)
time = %q(8 o'clock)
question = %q("What did you say?")
# good
name = 'Bruce Wayne'
time = "8 o'clock"
question = '"What did you say?"'
# bad
%r{\s+}
# good
%r{^/(.*)$}
%r{^/blog/2011/(.*)$}
-
Avoid the use of
%x
unless you're going to invoke a command with backquotes in it(which is rather unlikely).
# bad
date = %x(date)
# good
date = `date`
echo = %x(echo `date`)
-
Avoid the use of
%s
. It seems that the community has decided:"some string"
is the preferred way to create a symbol with spaces in it.
-
Prefer
()
as delimiters for all%
literals, except%r
. Since parentheses often appear inside regular expressions in many scenarios a less common character like{
might be a better choice for a delimiter, depending on the regexp's content.
# bad
%w[one two three]
%q{"Test's king!", John said.}
# good
%w(one two three)
%q("Test's king!", John said.)
-
The block form of
class_eval
is preferable to the string-interpolated form. - when you use the string-interpolated form, always supply__FILE__
and__LINE__
, so that your backtraces make sense:
class_eval 'def use_relative_model_naming?; true; end', __FILE__, __LINE__
define_method
is preferable toclass_eval{ def ... }
-
When using
class_eval
(or othereval
) with string interpolation, add a comment block showing its appearance if interpolated (a practice used in Rails code):
# from activesupport/lib/active_support/core_ext/string/output_safety.rb
UNSAFE_STRING_METHODS.each do |unsafe_method|
if 'String'.respond_to?(unsafe_method)
class_eval <<-EOT, __FILE__, __LINE__ + 1
def #{unsafe_method}(*params, &block) # def capitalize(*params, &block)
to_str.#{unsafe_method}(*params, &block) # to_str.capitalize(*params, &block)
end # end
def #{unsafe_method}!(*params) # def capitalize!(*params)
@dirty = true # @dirty = true
super # super
end # end
EOT
end
end
-
Avoid using
method_missing
for metaprogramming because backtraces become messy, the behavior is not listed in#methods
, and misspelled method calls might silently work, e.g.nukes.launch_state = false
. Consider using delegation, proxy, ordefine_method
instead. If you must usemethod_missing
:
-
Be sure to also define
respond_to_missing?
-
Only catch methods with a well-defined prefix, such as
find_by_*
-- make your code as assertive as possible. -
Call
super
at the end of your statement -
Delegate to assertive, non-magical methods:
# bad def method_missing?(meth, *params, &block) if /^find_by_(?<prop>.*)/ =~ meth # ... lots of code to do a find_by else super end end # good def method_missing?(meth, *params, &block) if /^find_by_(?<prop>.*)/ =~ meth find_by(prop, *params, &block) else super end end # best of all, though, would to define_method as each findable attribute is declared
- Avoid hashes as optional parameters. Does the method do too much? (Object initializers are exceptions for this rule).
- Avoid methods longer than 10 LOC (lines of code). Ideally, most methods will be shorter than 5 LOC. Empty lines do not contribute to the relevant LOC.
# bad
$foo_bar = 1
# good
module Foo
class << self
attr_accessor :bar
end
end
Foo.bar = 1
-
Use
OptionParser
for parsing complex command line options andruby -s
for trivial command line options.
Here's some tools to help you automatically check Ruby code against this guide.
RuboCop is a Ruby code style checker based on this style guide. RuboCop already covers a significant portion of the Guide, supports both MRI 1.9 and MRI 2.0 and has good Emacs integration.
RubyMine's code inspections are partially based on this guide.
The guide is still a work in progress - some rules are lacking examples, some rules don't have examples that illustrate them clearly enough. Improving such rules is a great (and simple way) to help the Ruby community!
In due time these issues will (hopefully) be addressed - just keep them in mind for now.
Nothing written in this guide is set in stone. It's my desire to work together with everyone interested in Ruby coding style, so that we could ultimately create a resource that will be beneficial to the entire Ruby community.
Feel free to open tickets or send pull requests with improvements. Thanks in advance for your help!
You can also support the project (and RuboCop) with financial contributions via gittip.
It's easy, just follow the contribution guidelines.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License
A community-driven style guide is of little use to a community that doesn't know about its existence. Tweet about the guide, share it with your friends and colleagues. Every comment, suggestion or opinion we get makes the guide just a little bit better. And we want to have the best possible guide, don't we?
Cheers,
Bozhidar