Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add OP_TXHASH and OP_CHECKTXHASHVERIFY #51

Closed
wants to merge 12 commits into from

Conversation

stevenroose
Copy link

I changed the opcode that OP_CHECKTXHASHVERIFY would be replacing from OP_NOP4 to OP_NOP5.

@DrahtBot
Copy link
Collaborator

🐙 This pull request conflicts with the target branch and needs rebase.

@ajtowns
Copy link

ajtowns commented May 7, 2024

If you want to poke at this again, you probably want to bump to the 27.x branch.

@DrahtBot
Copy link
Collaborator

DrahtBot commented Aug 4, 2024

⌛ There hasn't been much activity lately and the patch still needs rebase. What is the status here?

  • Is it still relevant? ➡️ Please solve the conflicts to make it ready for review and to ensure the CI passes.
  • Is it no longer relevant? ➡️ Please close.
  • Did the author lose interest or time to work on this? ➡️ Please close it and mark it 'Up for grabs' with the label, so that it can be picked up in the future.

1 similar comment
@DrahtBot
Copy link
Collaborator

DrahtBot commented Nov 1, 2024

⌛ There hasn't been much activity lately and the patch still needs rebase. What is the status here?

  • Is it still relevant? ➡️ Please solve the conflicts to make it ready for review and to ensure the CI passes.
  • Is it no longer relevant? ➡️ Please close.
  • Did the author lose interest or time to work on this? ➡️ Please close it and mark it 'Up for grabs' with the label, so that it can be picked up in the future.

@ajtowns
Copy link

ajtowns commented Nov 24, 2024

Closing this

@ajtowns ajtowns closed this Nov 24, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants