Create HISTORY.md #1786
Create HISTORY.md #1786
Conversation
|
Nice! EDIT: I tried to contact Oprea Dan, Bart de Koning and Richard Bailey for a review. |
|
Richard Bailey replied to me, reviewed the history and had nothing to add or correct. He explained that he was not much involved and only round about 12 months within the project. I am not able to contact Dan Oprea, the founder. It is also a common name so he is hard to track down. He seems to be offline for years. |
Co-authored-by: buhtz <[email protected]>
|
Just added some ideas and minor improvements. What comes to my mind is if it isn't to technical in some paragraphs? I am not sure. Are you aware of the document about our Strategy Outline? I see some redundancy. But what is missing in the Strategy Outline is the description about the permission-error-problem. It might can move into it from the HISTORY document? EDIT: What I meant was. I think we have a lot of technical documents. It is not wrong to write about techncial details in HISTORY but it might not be so detailed or so deep. What I had in mind about a HISTORY document was a bit more "drama" and "emotions". 😄 It is about giving the project a face or faces. There are and where humans behind it. Knowing it or feeling it is different. And describing the long way of BIT would IMHO help with the emotional part. 😄 |
[skip ci] Co-authored-by: buhtz <[email protected]>
|
Feel free to copy the information on #988 and #994 into the Strategy Outline :) I think they also belong here, because these bugs shaped the history of the project. I can see how the Third Era is maybe redundant with that document, and a bit too detailed. You're welcome to shorten it. If you want "drama" and "emotion", then you also have to allow the "Dark Age" ;) |
|
OK, you got me. 🤣 Drama, baby! 😭 🎉 |
|
Having read this again after a few days, I think it's ready to commit. Feel free to merge, or enter the official "after creative pause" phase :) |
buhtz
added
the
PR: Merge after creative-break
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Have you seen the minor suggestions I made in the files?
I had other contributors in the past also missing it. Not sure if I do something wrong on the GitHub interface?
But beside that minor things I would suggest you to merge it yourself and earn the credits. 😄 ❤️
EDIT: Mhm... Maybe this comments appear only after I finishing a review?
Co-authored-by: buhtz <[email protected]>
|
Yes, the suggestions only showed up in this "conversation" after your comment, so you probably need to finish the "review" before others become aware. But it seems you can do many reviews after the other ;) Sorry, I forgot to [skip ci] this time … |
Here's the result of some archaeology! :)