Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make wording more explicit for _mod and remove MRI specificity of _acq #1778

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

yarikoptic
Copy link
Collaborator

_acq is also used in other modalities so description should be generic.

_mod- change relates to a discussion of _mod destiny in

bids-standard/bids-2-devel#70

and to accent that it is not really "modality" term (e.g. mri, eeg, ...) we use generally through out BIDS specification.

Some might argue about use of "contrast" to describe T1w etc but we do use "contrast" to that extent in other places already AFAIK.

… (used in other modalities)

Relates to a discussion of _mod destiny in

bids-standard/bids-2-devel#70
@yarikoptic yarikoptic added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 13, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 13, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 87.93%. Comparing base (943c20e) to head (ff1d55b).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1778   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   87.93%   87.93%           
=======================================
  Files          16       16           
  Lines        1351     1351           
=======================================
  Hits         1188     1188           
  Misses        163      163           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@yarikoptic
Copy link
Collaborator Author

yarikoptic commented Apr 13, 2024

I was wide off -- we did clarify modality definition in https://bids-specification.readthedocs.io/en/stable/common-principles.html#definitions and for better or for worse it was Ok and no need to bring in "contrast" here... I will adjust now

edit: nah -- better just close ;)

@yarikoptic yarikoptic closed this Apr 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant