Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add ImageNet-R,-A,-200 #3

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Add ImageNet-R,-A,-200 #3

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

stes
Copy link
Contributor

@stes stes commented May 15, 2021

Release Candidate. Besides new datasets, also introduces consistent formatting for all files in the robusta module.

stes and others added 2 commits May 15, 2021 17:08
Co-authored-by: George Pachitariu <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Evgenia Rusak <[email protected]>
pip install git+git://github.com/bethgelab/robustness.git

# Release candidate:
pip install git+git://github.com/bethgelab/robustness.git@rc
Copy link

@Djoels Djoels Mar 29, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

installing through the git protocol didn't seem to work for me (apparently a port/firewall issue?)
so I adapted this to
pip install git+https://github.com/bethgelab/robustness.git@rc

on python 3.6 I didn't succeed in importing, however when uninstalling I got this message:

Found existing installation: robusta 0.0.1
Uninstalling robusta-0.0.1:
  Would remove:
    /opt/anaconda3/envs/py36/lib/python3.6/site-packages/batchnorm/*
    /opt/anaconda3/envs/py36/lib/python3.6/site-packages/datasets/*
    /opt/anaconda3/envs/py36/lib/python3.6/site-packages/models/*
    /opt/anaconda3/envs/py36/lib/python3.6/site-packages/robusta-0.0.1.dist-info/*
    /opt/anaconda3/envs/py36/lib/python3.6/site-packages/selflearning/*

it appears the setuptools config has different behaviour when running in python 3.6 vs python 3.8? I will need to keep a cloned version of the github repo as pip installing is still not working for me either

Copy link

@Djoels Djoels left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the additional imagenet datasets implementations correlate with what I expected. the only thing I'm not familiar with is the BiT models, but changes seem to be mostly about punctuation. apologies for the delay

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants