Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update typescript-eslint monorepo to v5.62.0 #4

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link

@renovate renovate bot commented Jun 26, 2023

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin (source) 5.60.0 -> 5.62.0 age adoption passing confidence
@typescript-eslint/parser (source) 5.60.0 -> 5.62.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@​typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin)

v5.62.0

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • eslint-plugin: [comma-spacing] allow no space after trailing comma in objects and arrays (#​6938) (24bdacc)
  • eslint-plugin: [prefer-includes] escape special characters (#​7161) (5a347a5), closes #​7145
  • eslint-plugin: replace auto-fix of class literal property style rule with suggestion (#​7054) (a8c824a)
Features
  • eslint-plugin: [prefer-nullish-coalescing] add ignorePrimitives option (#​6487) (6edaa04)

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v5.61.0

Compare Source

Features

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

5.60.1 (2023-06-26)

Note: Version bump only for package @​typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v5.60.1

Compare Source

Note: Version bump only for package @​typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@​typescript-eslint/parser)

v5.62.0

Compare Source

Note: Version bump only for package @​typescript-eslint/parser

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v5.61.0

Compare Source

Note: Version bump only for package @​typescript-eslint/parser

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

5.60.1 (2023-06-26)

Note: Version bump only for package @​typescript-eslint/parser

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v5.60.1

Compare Source

Note: Version bump only for package @​typescript-eslint/parser

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "after 4am,before 7am" in timezone America/Edmonton, Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 26, 2023

Coverage Report

File Coverage
All files 100%
src/example.ts 100%

Minimum allowed coverage is 100%

Generated by 🐒 cobertura-action against 41554d8

@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update typescript-eslint monorepo to v5.60.1 chore(deps): update typescript-eslint monorepo to v5.61.0 Jul 4, 2023
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo branch from 89f1b93 to 6420853 Compare July 4, 2023 14:57
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update typescript-eslint monorepo to v5.61.0 chore(deps): update typescript-eslint monorepo to v5.62.0 Jul 12, 2023
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo branch from 6420853 to 41554d8 Compare July 12, 2023 02:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants