Feat/verifiable claims #396
Conversation
|
Warning Rate Limit Exceeded@MdechampG has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 8 minutes and 16 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. WalkthroughThe recent updates aim to enhance the understanding of governance and consent within the OKP4 protocol. This involves refining the description of rules and integrating the concept of Verifiable Credentials. The changes highlight the dynamic and complex nature of blockchain rule enforcement and emphasize the pivotal role of Verifiable Credentials in decentralized identity systems, aligning with self-sovereign governance principles and the registration of Verifiable Presentations. Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| Device | URL |
|---|---|
| desktop | http://localhost:3000/ |
| Device | URL |
|---|---|
| mobile | http://localhost:3000/ |
Not what you expected? Are your scores flaky? GitHub runners could be the cause.
Try running on Foo instead
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 6
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (2)
- docs/academy/rules.mdx (1 hunks)
- docs/academy/verifiable-claims.md (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 2
docs/academy/rules.mdx (2)
- 13-20: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [1-1]
The
sidebar_class_name: hiddenmetadata at the top of the file effectively hides the sidebar for this page, ensuring a focused reading experience.The use of
sidebar_class_name: hiddenis appropriate for this documentation page.
- 16-17: The explanation of the OKP4 protocol's rule enforcement mechanism is comprehensive, detailing the complexities involved in managing digital resources and the decision-making processes based on these rules.
The updated description enhances understanding of the protocol's governance and consent rules.
MdechampG
force-pushed
the
feat/verifiable-claims
branch
from
0dabac1 to
f70e57a
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (2)
- docs/academy/rules.mdx (1 hunks)
- docs/academy/verifiable-claims.md (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- docs/academy/rules.mdx
- docs/academy/verifiable-claims.md
Co-authored-by: Chris <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Chris <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- docs/academy/verifiable-claims.md (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- docs/academy/verifiable-claims.md
Add page Verifiable Claims principles in the academy.
Still to do:
@ccamel can you please especially review the last part that I changed as we discussed ?
Summary by CodeRabbit