Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Docs/overview section #346

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 6, 2023
Merged

Docs/overview section #346

merged 2 commits into from
Nov 6, 2023

Conversation

ccamel
Copy link
Member

@ccamel ccamel commented Nov 6, 2023

Self explanatory.

Uses capture-website-cli in the workflow to update the screenshot of the docs.okp4.network website from the command-line.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Added a GitHub Actions workflow to capture and update a screenshot of a website on a weekly basis or manual trigger.
  • Documentation
    • Enhanced the README with an "Overview" section, providing a brief description of the repository and a link to the OKP4 documentation portal.
    • Included a screenshot of the documentation portal in the README.

@ccamel ccamel self-assigned this Nov 6, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 6, 2023

Walkthrough

The repository has been updated with a new GitHub Actions workflow that captures a screenshot of a website and commits it to the repository. This workflow can be triggered manually or on a weekly schedule. It runs on Ubuntu 22.04 and performs several steps, including checking out the repository, importing a GPG key, setting up the Node.js environment, capturing a screenshot of the website using the capture-website-cli tool, and committing the changes with a specific commit message.

Additionally, the README file has been enhanced with an overview section, providing a brief description of the repository and a link to the OKP4 documentation portal. A screenshot of the portal is also included in the README.

Changes

File Summary
.github/workflows/capture-website.yml A new GitHub Actions workflow has been added. It captures a screenshot of a website and commits it to the repository. The workflow can be triggered manually or on a weekly schedule. It runs on Ubuntu 22.04 and performs several steps, including checking out the repository, importing a GPG key, setting up the Node.js environment, capturing a screenshot of the website using the capture-website-cli tool, and committing the changes with a specific commit message.
README.md An overview section has been added to the README file. It provides a brief description of the repository and a link to the OKP4 documentation portal. A screenshot of the portal is also included in the README.

Poem

🐇 Hopping through the code, under the autumn 🍂 sky so broad,

Changes made, a new path 🛤️ laid, in the repository's abode.

Screenshots captured, README enraptured, with details and a portal link,

Celebrating this day in history, when the first artificial satellite 🛰️ did blink.

So here's to progress, and to success, in this digital domain,

As we code and create, and celebrate, in sunshine or in rain. 🌦️


Tips

Chat with CodeRabbit Bot (@coderabbitai)

  • If you reply to a review comment from CodeRabbit, the bot will automatically respond.
  • To engage with CodeRabbit bot directly around the specific lines of code in the PR, mention @coderabbitai in your review comment
  • Note: Review comments are made on code diffs or files, not on the PR overview.
  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.
  • @coderabbitai resolve to resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.

Note: For conversation with the bot, please use the review comments on code diffs or files.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 1

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between b6430a1 and 4588389.
Files ignored due to filter (1)
  • screenshot.png
Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/capture-website.yml (1 hunks)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • README.md
Additional comments: 1
.github/workflows/capture-website.yml (1)
  • 1-54: The workflow looks well-structured and follows the best practices for GitHub Actions. However, there are a few points to consider:
  • Ensure that all the secrets used in this workflow are properly set in the repository settings.
  • The capture-website-cli tool is run with the --dark-mode option. Verify if this is the intended behavior as it will capture the website in dark mode.
  • The --launch-options='{"headless": "new"}' option seems incorrect. The headless option usually accepts a boolean value. Please verify this.
  • The workflow is set to run on Ubuntu 22.04. Ensure that all the tools used in this workflow are compatible with this version.
  • The workflow uses actions/setup-node@v4 with node-version: 18.12. Ensure that capture-website-cli is compatible with this Node.js version.
  • The workflow is set to cancel any in-progress run if a new one is triggered on the same branch. This is a good practice to avoid unnecessary runs, but make sure it aligns with your CI/CD strategy.

@ccamel ccamel force-pushed the docs/overview-section branch from 4588389 to cd08858 Compare November 6, 2023 11:00
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 3

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between b6430a1 and cd08858.
Files ignored due to filter (1)
  • screenshot.png
Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/capture-website.yml (1 hunks)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • README.md

.github/workflows/capture-website.yml Show resolved Hide resolved
.github/workflows/capture-website.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@ccamel ccamel force-pushed the docs/overview-section branch 2 times, most recently from cb62c0e to 5f69390 Compare November 6, 2023 11:13
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between b6430a1 and cb62c0e.
Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/capture-website.yml (1 hunks)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • README.md
Additional comments: 3
.github/workflows/capture-website.yml (3)
  • 42-42: The headless option should be a boolean value. This was previously pointed out in the review comments.
- --launch-options='{"headless": "new"}' \
+ --launch-options='{"headless": true}' \
  • 44-44: The output file format specified in the --type option is webp, but the output file name has a .png extension. Ensure that the file type and extension match.
- --output screenshot.png \
+ --output screenshot.webp \
  • 54-54: The commit message should follow the conventional commits specification. The current message does not include a scope. Consider adding a scope to provide additional contextual information.
- commit_message: "feat: update website screenshot"
+ commit_message: "feat(website): update screenshot"

@ccamel ccamel force-pushed the docs/overview-section branch from 5f69390 to 89b0255 Compare November 6, 2023 11:22
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 3

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between b6430a1 and 89b0255.
Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/capture-website.yml (1 hunks)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • README.md
Additional comments: 1
.github/workflows/capture-website.yml (1)
  • 1-54: The workflow looks good overall. It checks out the repository, sets up the necessary environment, captures a screenshot of the website, and commits the changes. The use of secrets for sensitive information is a good practice. The concurrency settings ensure that only one instance of the workflow runs at a time, which is useful for avoiding conflicts or unnecessary resource usage.

.github/workflows/capture-website.yml Show resolved Hide resolved
.github/workflows/capture-website.yml Show resolved Hide resolved
.github/workflows/capture-website.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@ccamel ccamel force-pushed the docs/overview-section branch from 89b0255 to 4a1cb17 Compare November 6, 2023 11:30
@ccamel
Copy link
Member Author

ccamel commented Nov 6, 2023

@coderabbitai review

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 1

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between b6430a1 and 4a1cb17.
Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/capture-website.yml (1 hunks)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • README.md
Additional comments: 1
.github/workflows/capture-website.yml (1)
  • 1-54: The workflow looks well-structured and follows best practices for GitHub Actions. It's good to see that you're using a concurrency group to prevent multiple runs of the workflow from overlapping. Also, the use of GPG signing for commits is a good security practice. However, please ensure that the secrets used in this workflow are properly set in the repository settings.

.github/workflows/capture-website.yml Show resolved Hide resolved
@ccamel ccamel requested a review from amimart November 6, 2023 11:53
Copy link
Member

@amimart amimart left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice one 👍

@ccamel ccamel merged commit 141dda8 into main Nov 6, 2023
11 checks passed
@ccamel ccamel deleted the docs/overview-section branch November 6, 2023 12:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants