Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix typos in reference.md #95

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 29, 2023
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions docs/src/reference.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ can be calculated as
```

The flux density is related to the magnetic field, ``\bm{H}``, by the standard linear
consitutive relationship ``\bm{H} = \mu_r^{-1}\bm{B}``.
constitutive relationship ``\bm{H} = \mu_r^{-1}\bm{B}``.

For a general isotropic lossy dielectric, the relative permittivity ``\varepsilon_r`` is a
complex scalar:
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ get their frequency domain representation for scattering parameter calculation.
Numeric wave ports assume a field with known normal-direction dependence
``\bm{E}(\bm{x})=\bm{e}(\bm{x}_t)e^{ik_n x_n}`` where ``k_n`` is the propagation constant.
For each operating frequency ``\omega``, a two-dimensional eigenvalue problem is solved on
the port yielding the mode shapes ``\bm{e}_m`` and associated propagaton constants
the port yielding the mode shapes ``\bm{e}_m`` and associated propagation constants
``k_{n,m}``. These are used in the full 3D model where the Robin port boundary condition has
coefficient ``\gamma=i\text{Re}\{k_{n,m}\}/\mu_r`` and the computed mode is used to compute
the incident field in the source term ``\bm{U}^{inc}`` at excited ports. Scattering
Expand Down