Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update all non-major dev dependencies #192

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Dec 30, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@types/lodash (source) 4.17.13 -> 4.17.14 age adoption passing confidence
@types/node (source) 20.17.10 -> 20.17.12 age adoption passing confidence
@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin (source) 8.18.2 -> 8.19.1 age adoption passing confidence
@typescript-eslint/parser (source) 8.18.2 -> 8.19.1 age adoption passing confidence
lint-staged 15.2.11 -> 15.3.0 age adoption passing confidence
typescript (source) 5.7.2 -> 5.7.3 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@​typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin)

v8.19.1

Compare Source

🩹 Fixes
  • eslint-plugin: [no-unnecessary-type-assertion] handle literal types (#​10523)
  • eslint-plugin: [no-deprecated] doesn't report on shorthand property in an object expression (#​10550)
  • eslint-plugin: [strict-boolean-expressions] remove remaining (unsafe) autofixes (#​10548)
  • eslint-plugin: [no-shadow] report correctly on parameters of functions declared with the declare keyword (#​10543)
  • eslint-plugin: [no-base-to-string] check array generic type (#​10437)
❤️ Thank You
  • Kirk Waiblinger
  • mdm317
  • Ronen Amiel
  • Yukihiro Hasegawa @​y-hsgw

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v8.19.0

Compare Source

🚀 Features
  • eslint-plugin: [strict-boolean-expressions] check array predicate functions' return statements (#​10106)
🩹 Fixes
  • eslint-plugin: [member-ordering] ignore method overloading (#​10536)
  • eslint-plugin: [consistent-indexed-object-style] don't report on indirect circular references (#​10537)
  • eslint-plugin: [array-type] autofix with conditional types needs parentheses (#​10522)
  • eslint-plugin: add getConstraintInfo to handle generic constraints better (#​10496)
❤️ Thank You

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@​typescript-eslint/parser)

v8.19.1

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for parser to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v8.19.0

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for parser to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

lint-staged/lint-staged (lint-staged)

v15.3.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
  • #​1495 e69da9e Thanks @​iiroj! - Added more info to the debug logs so that "environment" info doesn't need to be added separately to GitHub issues.

  • #​1493 fa0fe98 Thanks @​iiroj! - Added more help messages around the automatic git stash that lint-staged creates as a backup (by default). The console output also displays the short git hash of the stash so that it's easier to recover lost files in case some fatal errors are encountered, or the process is killed before completing.

    For example:

    % npx lint-staged
    ✔ Backed up original state in git stash (20addf8)
    ✔ Running tasks for staged files...
    ✔ Applying modifications from tasks...
    ✔ Cleaning up temporary files...
    

    where the backup can be seen with git show 20addf8, or git stash list:

    % git stash list
    stash@{0}: lint-staged automatic backup (20addf8)
    
microsoft/TypeScript (typescript)

v5.7.3

Compare Source


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "* 0-3 * * 1" in timezone America/Chicago, Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot requested a review from a team December 30, 2024 07:49
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 30, 2024

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 30, 2024

🏗️ E2E / ts-no-cli-runner (#1797)  •  ➡️ View in Autoblocks


🟢  typescript-e2e-test-suite-1-no-cli-runner

Overall
Pass Rate 100.00% (+0.00%)
Passed 4 (+0.00)
Failed 0 (+0.00)
Evaluator ID Min Score Avg Score Max Score Passed Failed Skipped
has-all-substrings 1.00 (+0.00) 1.00 (+0.00) 1.00 (+0.00) 4 (+0) 0 (+0) 0 (+0)
is-friendly 0.22 (+0.06) 0.50 (+0.08) 0.85 (+0.28) 4 (+0) 0 (+0) 0 (+0)
Test Case Duration
Min 3.44ms (-60)
Avg 326.2ms (+152.67)
Max 589.98ms (+285.41)

 
 
🟢  typescript-e2e-test-suite-2-no-cli-runner

Overall
Pass Rate 100.00% (+30.00%)
Passed 10 (+3.00)
Failed 0 (-3.00)
Evaluator ID Min Score Avg Score Max Score Passed Failed Skipped
has-all-substrings 1.00 (+1.00) 1.00 (+0.30) 1.00 (+0.00) 10 (+3) 0 (-3) 0 (+0)
is-friendly 0.02 (-0.14) 0.53 (-0.02) 0.95 (-0.01) 10 (+0) 0 (+0) 0 (+0)
Test Case Duration
Min 20.39ms (-248.21)
Avg 311.01ms (-222.33)
Max 960.26ms (+69.9)

 
 

Generated by Autoblocks against bba06c8

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 30, 2024

🏗️ E2E / ts (#1796)  •  ➡️ View in Autoblocks


🔴  typescript-e2e-test-suite-1-with-cli-runner

Overall
Pass Rate 75.00% (-25.00%)
Passed 3 (-1.00)
Failed 1 (+1.00)
Evaluator ID Min Score Avg Score Max Score Passed Failed Skipped
has-all-substrings 0.00 (-1.00) 0.75 (-0.25) 1.00 (+0.00) 3 (-1) 1 (+1) 0 (+0)
is-friendly 0.21 (-0.02) 0.53 (+0.01) 0.98 (+0.13) 4 (+0) 0 (+0) 0 (+0)
Test Case Duration
Min 322.44ms (+71.13)
Avg 556.39ms (+42.58)
Max 680.07ms (-79.62)

 
 
🔴  typescript-e2e-test-suite-2-with-cli-runner

Overall
Pass Rate 80.00% (+10.00%)
Passed 8 (+1.00)
Failed 2 (-1.00)
Evaluator ID Min Score Avg Score Max Score Passed Failed Skipped
has-all-substrings 0.00 (+0.00) 0.80 (+0.10) 1.00 (+0.00) 8 (+1) 2 (-1) 0 (+0)
is-friendly 0.08 (+0.05) 0.46 (+0.19) 0.83 (+0.16) 10 (+0) 0 (+0) 0 (+0)
Test Case Duration
Min 145.51ms (+142.68)
Avg 389.46ms (+7.66)
Max 770.85ms (-95.35)

 
 

Generated by Autoblocks against bba06c8

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 30, 2024

🏗️ E2E / py-no-cli-runner (#1797)  •  ➡️ View in Autoblocks


🟢  python-e2e-test-suite-1-no-cli-runner    x = "x1"  y = "y1"

Overall
Pass Rate 100.00% (+0.00%)
Passed 4 (+0.00)
Failed 0 (+0.00)
Evaluator ID Min Score Avg Score Max Score Passed Failed Skipped
has-all-substrings 1.00 (+0.00) 1.00 (+0.00) 1.00 (+0.00) 4 (+0) 0 (+0) 0 (+0)
is-friendly 0.16 (+0.01) 0.53 (-0.00) 0.97 (+0.00) 4 (+0) 0 (+0) 0 (+0)
Test Case Duration
Min 283.88ms (+278.76)
Avg 439.73ms (-177.3)
Max 658.32ms (-285.68)

 
 
🔴  python-e2e-test-suite-1-no-cli-runner    x = "x2"  y = "y1"

Overall
Pass Rate 75.00% (-25.00%)
Passed 3 (-1.00)
Failed 1 (+1.00)
Evaluator ID Min Score Avg Score Max Score Passed Failed Skipped
has-all-substrings 0.00 (-1.00) 0.75 (-0.25) 1.00 (+0.00) 3 (-1) 1 (+1) 0 (+0)
is-friendly 0.01 (-0.14) 0.38 (-0.16) 0.74 (-0.24) 4 (+0) 0 (+0) 0 (+0)
Test Case Duration
Min 197.02ms (+191.91)
Avg 555.16ms (-61.87)
Max 825.59ms (-118.42)

 
 
🔴  python-e2e-test-suite-2-no-cli-runner

Overall
Pass Rate 80.00% (+0.00%)
Passed 8 (+0.00)
Failed 2 (+0.00)
Evaluator ID Min Score Avg Score Max Score Passed Failed Skipped
has-all-substrings 0.00 (+0.00) 0.80 (+0.00) 1.00 (+0.00) 8 (+0) 2 (+0) 0 (+0)
is-friendly 0.32 (+0.02) 0.52 (-0.08) 0.77 (-0.06) 4 (-6) 0 (+0) 6 (+6)
Test Case Duration
Min 19.21ms (-126.06)
Avg 644.27ms (+111.75)
Max 992.68ms (+19.39)

 
 

Generated by Autoblocks against bba06c8

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 30, 2024

🏗️ E2E / py (#1797)  •  ➡️ View in Autoblocks


🔴  python-e2e-test-suite-1-with-cli-runner    x = "x1"  y = "y1"

Overall
Pass Rate 75.00% (+0.00%)
Passed 3 (+0.00)
Failed 1 (+0.00)
Evaluator ID Min Score Avg Score Max Score Passed Failed Skipped
has-all-substrings 0.00 (+0.00) 0.75 (+0.00) 1.00 (+0.00) 3 (+0) 1 (+0) 0 (+0)
is-friendly 0.01 (-0.66) 0.38 (-0.33) 0.70 (-0.06) 3 (+1) 0 (+0) 1 (-1)
Test Case Duration
Min 426.54ms (+368.33)
Avg 665.31ms (+223.19)
Max 906.15ms (+83.87)

 
 
🟢  python-e2e-test-suite-1-with-cli-runner    x = "x2"  y = "y1"

Overall
Pass Rate 100.00% (+25.00%)
Passed 4 (+1.00)
Failed 0 (-1.00)
Evaluator ID Min Score Avg Score Max Score Passed Failed Skipped
has-all-substrings 1.00 (+1.00) 1.00 (+0.25) 1.00 (+0.00) 4 (+1) 0 (-1) 0 (+0)
is-friendly 0.54 (-0.13) 0.76 (+0.04) 0.96 (+0.20) 4 (+2) 0 (+0) 0 (-2)
Test Case Duration
Min 233.42ms (+175.21)
Avg 476.15ms (+34.04)
Max 869.63ms (+47.35)

 
 
🔴  python-e2e-test-suite-2-with-cli-runner

Overall
Pass Rate 90.00% (+10.00%)
Passed 9 (+1.00)
Failed 1 (-1.00)
Evaluator ID Min Score Avg Score Max Score Passed Failed Skipped
has-all-substrings 0.00 (+0.00) 0.90 (+0.10) 1.00 (+0.00) 9 (+1) 1 (-1) 0 (+0)
is-friendly 0.03 (-0.00) 0.56 (+0.03) 0.97 (-0.02) 10 (+0) 0 (+0) 0 (+0)
Test Case Duration
Min 4.16ms (-11.06)
Avg 552.53ms (+104.78)
Max 937.02ms (+50.16)

 
 

Generated by Autoblocks against bba06c8

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/all-minor-patch-dev branch from 6e6950c to a8402d3 Compare December 30, 2024 17:35
@renovate renovate bot changed the title Update dependency lint-staged to v15.3.0 Update all non-major dev dependencies Dec 30, 2024
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/all-minor-patch-dev branch 3 times, most recently from 8f8021c to 4a1b411 Compare January 6, 2025 11:03
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/all-minor-patch-dev branch from 4a1b411 to bba06c8 Compare January 8, 2025 15:00
Copy link
Contributor Author

renovate bot commented Jan 8, 2025

⚠️ Artifact update problem

Renovate failed to update an artifact related to this branch. You probably do not want to merge this PR as-is.

♻ Renovate will retry this branch, including artifacts, only when one of the following happens:

  • any of the package files in this branch needs updating, or
  • the branch becomes conflicted, or
  • you click the rebase/retry checkbox if found above, or
  • you rename this PR's title to start with "rebase!" to trigger it manually

The artifact failure details are included below:

File name: package-lock.json

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants