Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactors and new algorithms #978

Draft
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

refactors and new algorithms #978

wants to merge 7 commits into from

Conversation

panva
Copy link
Contributor

@panva panva commented Sep 11, 2024

  • chore: ignore package-lock.json
  • refactor: use async node:crypto methods when available
  • test: remove deprecated use of Buffer()
  • feat: add support for curve secp256k1 (ES256K)
  • feat: add support for Ed25519 and Ed448 (EdDSA)

@panva panva force-pushed the wip branch 2 times, most recently from ae413b9 to 5331137 Compare September 11, 2024 12:09
@panva panva force-pushed the wip branch 2 times, most recently from dffd632 to 593b04d Compare September 11, 2024 12:20
@panva
Copy link
Contributor Author

panva commented Sep 11, 2024

💚 CI https://app.circleci.com/pipelines/github/auth0/node-jsonwebtoken/254

@panva panva marked this pull request as ready for review September 11, 2024 12:23
@panva panva force-pushed the wip branch 2 times, most recently from c010d65 to 6f3d63b Compare September 11, 2024 16:20
Copy link
Member

@ArturKlajnerok ArturKlajnerok left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @panva & @jakelacey2012 👋
Anything blocking us from merging those improvements?

Copy link
Member

@ArturKlajnerok ArturKlajnerok Oct 18, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we bump the version to "version" : "10.0.0" ?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@panva panva Oct 18, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nope, this is not breaking the declared supported engines.

Anything blocking us from merging those improvements?

Nothing from my end.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we need to add a few more reviewers?

Seems that ci/circleci is still having some issues
ci/circleci: node-v18 Expected — Waiting for status to be reported

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've linked the actual pipeline results above. In a followup to this @frederikprijck mentioned migrating to github actions.

@panva panva marked this pull request as draft November 2, 2024 12:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants