-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactors and new algorithms #978
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
panva
commented
Sep 11, 2024
•
edited
Loading
edited
- chore: ignore package-lock.json
- refactor: use async node:crypto methods when available
- test: remove deprecated use of Buffer()
- feat: add support for curve secp256k1 (ES256K)
- feat: add support for Ed25519 and Ed448 (EdDSA)
ae413b9
to
5331137
Compare
dffd632
to
593b04d
Compare
c010d65
to
6f3d63b
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @panva & @jakelacey2012 👋
Anything blocking us from merging those improvements?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we bump the version to "version" : "10.0.0"
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nope, this is not breaking the declared supported engines.
Anything blocking us from merging those improvements?
Nothing from my end.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we need to add a few more reviewers?
Seems that ci/circleci is still having some issues
ci/circleci: node-v18 Expected — Waiting for status to be reported
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've linked the actual pipeline results above. In a followup to this @frederikprijck mentioned migrating to github actions.