Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Eagerly init subgraph operation for subscription primary nodes #6509

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 7, 2025

Conversation

tninesling
Copy link
Contributor

@tninesling tninesling commented Jan 3, 2025

When subgraph operations are deserialized, typically from a query plan cache, they are not automatically parsed into a full document. Each node needs to initialize its operation(s) prior to execution, and the primary node inside SubscriptionNode was missed in the first pass.

This PR also includes a test for demand control scoring. The new test does not reproduce this original issue, but it does provide some basic coverage to ensure scoring handles this operation type.


Checklist

Complete the checklist (and note appropriate exceptions) before the PR is marked ready-for-review.

  • Changes are compatible1
  • Documentation2 completed
  • Performance impact assessed and acceptable
  • Tests added and passing3
    • Unit Tests
    • Integration Tests
    • Manual Tests

Exceptions

Note any exceptions here

Notes

Footnotes

  1. It may be appropriate to bring upcoming changes to the attention of other (impacted) groups. Please endeavour to do this before seeking PR approval. The mechanism for doing this will vary considerably, so use your judgement as to how and when to do this.

  2. Configuration is an important part of many changes. Where applicable please try to document configuration examples.

  3. Tick whichever testing boxes are applicable. If you are adding Manual Tests, please document the manual testing (extensively) in the Exceptions.

…plan nodes. This prevents initialization errors when the subscription plan was deserialized without being parsed (ie. it came from cache).
@tninesling tninesling requested review from a team as code owners January 3, 2025 21:49
@svc-apollo-docs
Copy link
Collaborator

svc-apollo-docs commented Jan 3, 2025

✅ Docs Preview Ready

No new or changed pages found.

This comment has been minimized.

@router-perf
Copy link

router-perf bot commented Jan 3, 2025

CI performance tests

  • connectors-const - Connectors stress test that runs with a constant number of users
  • const - Basic stress test that runs with a constant number of users
  • demand-control-instrumented - A copy of the step test, but with demand control monitoring and metrics enabled
  • demand-control-uninstrumented - A copy of the step test, but with demand control monitoring enabled
  • enhanced-signature - Enhanced signature enabled
  • events - Stress test for events with a lot of users and deduplication ENABLED
  • events_big_cap_high_rate - Stress test for events with a lot of users, deduplication enabled and high rate event with a big queue capacity
  • events_big_cap_high_rate_callback - Stress test for events with a lot of users, deduplication enabled and high rate event with a big queue capacity using callback mode
  • events_callback - Stress test for events with a lot of users and deduplication ENABLED in callback mode
  • events_without_dedup - Stress test for events with a lot of users and deduplication DISABLED
  • events_without_dedup_callback - Stress test for events with a lot of users and deduplication DISABLED using callback mode
  • extended-reference-mode - Extended reference mode enabled
  • large-request - Stress test with a 1 MB request payload
  • no-tracing - Basic stress test, no tracing
  • reload - Reload test over a long period of time at a constant rate of users
  • step-jemalloc-tuning - Clone of the basic stress test for jemalloc tuning
  • step-local-metrics - Field stats that are generated from the router rather than FTV1
  • step-with-prometheus - A copy of the step test with the Prometheus metrics exporter enabled
  • step - Basic stress test that steps up the number of users over time
  • xlarge-request - Stress test with 10 MB request payload
  • xxlarge-request - Stress test with 100 MB request payload

@tninesling tninesling requested a review from a team as a code owner January 3, 2025 21:55
Copy link
Member

@goto-bus-stop goto-bus-stop left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice! Is it reasonable to also add a test for the case that used to panic?

@tninesling
Copy link
Contributor Author

Nice! Is it reasonable to also add a test for the case that used to panic?

Hey! Thanks for the review. I'm going to spend some more time today trying to do so, but I spent the better part of an afternoon on it last week and couldn't get it to panic. I figured it would be caused by enabling Subscriptions + Rust QP + QP caching, but that didn't seem to do the trick.

@tninesling tninesling merged commit bd12e44 into dev Jan 7, 2025
12 of 13 checks passed
@tninesling tninesling deleted the tninesling/subscription-scoring branch January 7, 2025 16:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants