Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: avoid memory overhead when there is large number of LMQ CQ #8956

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 20, 2024

Conversation

lizhanhui
Copy link
Contributor

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes

Fixes #8829

Brief Description

Clipboard_Screenshot_1732073225

How Did You Test This Change?

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 66.66667% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 47.65%. Comparing base (c13f051) to head (5d7e6e5).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...rocketmq/store/queue/RocksDBConsumeQueueStore.java 33.33% 1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##             develop    #8956      +/-   ##
=============================================
- Coverage      47.66%   47.65%   -0.02%     
+ Complexity     11760    11743      -17     
=============================================
  Files           1303     1303              
  Lines          91064    91068       +4     
  Branches       11681    11683       +2     
=============================================
- Hits           43408    43398      -10     
- Misses         42282    42297      +15     
+ Partials        5374     5373       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.


🚨 Try these New Features:

@RongtongJin RongtongJin merged commit 8505482 into apache:develop Nov 20, 2024
11 checks passed
@lizhanhui lizhanhui deleted the opt-lmq-memory branch November 22, 2024 04:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Feature] LMQ Optimization: Revamp on top of RocksDB
4 participants